chownie

10 ms·

121.
by chownie 2y ago
Sure, no one can see it due to the censorship but you can say it into the void unseen which is of course what you meant.
122.
by chownie 2y ago
You have to search that word specifically to find those posts, they're otherwise algorithmically censored from timelines.
123.
by chownie 2y ago
You have to search that word specifically to find those posts, they're otherwise algorithmically censored from timelines.
124.
by chownie 2y ago
> You can still say anything you like on X You cannot even say the word "cisgender" on X.
125.
by chownie 2y ago
I suppose the extra context is that this entire situation was solved in less than a day, can (and does) happen on any other platform including X, and from what the author has shared this scam doesn't actually seem to have worked on any
126.
by chownie 2y ago
I mean, there kind of is a special Mormon healthcare system in that they are traditionally forbidden to take part in drug use or to drink alcohol. I would not be super shocked if alcoholism made up some of that seven year gap between non-LD
127.
by chownie 2y ago
Some of us don't grow beards, so you just end up looking like a tall child struggling on hard times.
128.
by chownie 2y ago
> As an industry, why haven't we figured out how to make drop downs that consistently open for all users? Is accessibility just that hard? Are there web frameworks/web components BBC should be using that already handle this? I
129.
by chownie 2y ago
Equally if we didn't distance ourselves from people who make harmful mistakes and those who believe dangerous, bigoted things we would all live miserably.
130.
by chownie 2y ago
Jewish communities are more tightly knit, and the families in these communities more interwoven with one another than the average Protestant would be to their own. My intuition would be that nepotism would be more rife with this kind of com
131.
by chownie 2y ago
No one is looking at Digimon and saying it looks like Pokemon now , but in the 90s they sure as heck were. People's mothers (ie the key demographic for "the uninitiated") commonly confused one for the other, even the TV show
132.
by chownie 2y ago
The entire lawfare approach thus far has been via patent dispute from what I understand, so the gameplay is actually what's being argued.
133.
by chownie 2y ago
From what I understand their lawfare approach is using japanese software patent law, they have notably not tried to do the same using trademark or copyright infringement. If they could get away with what you're suggesting, I imagine
134.
by chownie 2y ago
It's not absurd, once you remember that autistic people are human beings with feelings. Edit: Sort of shocked that I am having to spell this out to all the "but embryos..." posters, but the backlash is coming from autistic hu
135.
by chownie 2y ago
Ah I realize my first comment is maybe not written so well. I meant to convey, it looks to me that some irrationally high dummy testing values (put there because we're seeing historically high winds and they wish to test that behaviour
136.
by chownie 2y ago
Given the chronological proximity to the real hurricane force winds in the US right now, seems fair to me to assume someone at the weather data source was testing how these values might propagate/display and the test values escaped con
137.
by chownie 2y ago
Why is it a good thing?
138.
by chownie 2y ago
Was the legality the question? If so it seems we care about data "theft" in a very one sided manner.
139.
by chownie 2y ago
Fair enough! You seem to be the expert.
140.
by chownie 2y ago
I didn't look at your comment history at all, I just have showdead on so I could see all the your flagged, dead replies in this thread. I think HN has become biased against people who default to weird angry outbursts more than anything
141.
by chownie 2y ago
I went looking for the outright rage you're talking about and I don't see any signs of it, given your small collection of replies with a decent number of them flagged are you sure that this isn't projection on your behalf?
142.
by chownie 2y ago
The article has no teeth when you actually read the quote? What's written: categorical condemnation of AI has ableist and classist undertones How does this equate to that headline at all? I've not seen such obvious dishonesty sinc
143.
by chownie 2y ago
Since we're chiming in, exercise doesn't usually improve my condition when I'm depressed and occasionally instead exacerbates it.
144.
by chownie 2y ago
I'm confused, you paint a picture in which the majority drink moderately and then say "likely not healthy" but in your example 90% of the customers, the vast majority, don't have an unhealthy relationship with alcohol. S
145.
by chownie 2y ago
"destroyed" is perhaps a bit hyperbolic, with these medications HIV now has a better prognosis than diabetes.
146.
by chownie 2y ago
Uninterested in a sockpuppet's views, sorry. If you're serious come back on your main and we'll discuss without all the creative attempts you've made to answer sentence A while ignoring sentence B.
147.
by chownie 2y ago
"health" did not improve, cirrhosis of the liver cases dropped. At the same time crimes related to drug addiction jumped 45% and all crime was up 20%. That article is blinding the reader in its selective use of stats, by limitin
148.
by chownie 2y ago
That's only if prohibition works, prohibition of consumption does not have a great track record of actually accomplishing the intended outcome. If instead you look at why people drink, why they over consume, you can work levers that wa
149.
by chownie 2y ago
No, that is what constitutes the word evidence, I think you've mistaken the meaning of proof for the meaning of evidence. There is evidence that aborigines affected the climate, but there is not proof.
150.
by chownie 2y ago
It was intended to be read as a tiny minority who are increasingly vocal, rather than increasingly tiny.

More ›