chillage

7 ms·

31.
by chillage 5y ago
If you are genuinely interested you can look through that page yourself to see if you can find evidence matching your stringent criteria :) I am not able to read your mind to guess what you’ll find convincing and am sure you can do your own
32.
by chillage 5y ago
I mean no, I don't have a list with more than 500 sources for you, so if this one is insufficiently exhaustive then I guess we are at an impasse
33.
by chillage 5y ago
Not to throw the book at you but here is a pretty hugely detailed article with near 500 sources from very diverse media https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_genocide
34.
by chillage 5y ago
Vast social networks, family, friends of friends. Your identity is tied to who you are and very many people who you know in your town either knows your family or knows someone who knows your family. Indians have very extensive social ties
35.
by chillage 5y ago
Original video link in the article doesn't seem to be working. This looks like a reupload of the same video, so far as I can guess https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwpLqTmvqVk
36.
by chillage 5y ago
Search for C# comes up with nothing. Guessing it's a parsing error related to the # sign?
37.
by chillage 5y ago
Even further, it's the best camera with the lens AND tripod you have with you Went for a night walk yesterday and saw a cool snail. The new iPhone 13 pro took a decent shot of the snail in the dark with automated long exposure and bui
38.
by chillage 5y ago
> Your argument is the same as “Guns don’t kill people. People kill people”. Sort of, the argument is more like "Computers don't kill people. People with computers kill people by starting revolutions, committing online crimes,
39.
by chillage 5y ago
Honestly, agreed.. Well to start, Facebook is neither good or nor bad - it is not a person and does not have morality. The human mind is not really capable of dealing with an abstract entity such as a corporation so we anthropomorphize the
40.
by chillage 5y ago
It's absolutely fair that this type of data is better off coming from a third party, peer reviewed, and with a larger sample size. However, the slides here were never intended as any sort of definitive review, or especially not for PR
41.
by chillage 5y ago
I'm concerned that WSJ cherry picked only the worst bits of information from the slides and did not give a balanced discussion or quote the more positive results. They intentionally only included the most negative results and intention
42.
by chillage 5y ago
Oh ok thank you for the explanation, that does clear it up. So this decision applies to the US (though maybe not outside the US)
43.
by chillage 5y ago
There is a point here which really confuses me. This is an order by a California district judge. So that means it must only be valid in California? So Apple is allowed to keep its practices outside of that state? Or if not, then how can a C
44.
by chillage 5y ago
How do you deal with merging Lightroom catalog files if they are all indexed remote? Sounds like a tricky workflow
45.
by chillage 5y ago
Photographers have their photo collection as their life's work and source of professional value. It's viewed very differently from a personal photo collection and serves a very different purpose. They may need to access these phot
46.
by chillage 5y ago
For photographers these images are their life's work and professional value. They need to be able to go back and reference a client's photoshoot or pull up a higher resolution file or retouch a photo or come back to an old photo a
47.
by chillage 7y ago
Hasn't the consenting adult also been manipulated by a CES advertising booth into buying the sex item..? And why is it bad to use sex to manipulate a customer into buying an item, but it is good to use free samples or pretty pictures t
48.
by chillage 7y ago
So simultaneously it is both more for and more against sex. Using sex to sell things is bad but selling things for use during sex is good. If you tried to explain these moral values to visiting aliens their minds would explode.