chii

6 ms·

91.
by chii 3mo ago
The attack requires a third party to unknowingly click on the engineered URL that leak private video title. Not sure if it counts as a POC if you can only use your own channel to prove it works. But still, it would require a user interactio
92.
by chii 3mo ago
> They would say that they won't consider it as a bug, silently fix it and you are left there doing the work for free. then as long as you have a trail that proves you discovered and reported it, you can make this a PR nightmare for
93.
by chii 3mo ago
> That's why trains work and that's why trains work but you have to pay a higher price to use it, while youtube is shitty, and breaks often, but it's free to use. It is about the trade offs - not the trade offs that someon
94.
by chii 3mo ago
> something would have stopped the breaking change making its way to prod? or a prod outage causes the knowledge to be experienced.
95.
by chii 3mo ago
for such a wide ranging effects, brexit's vote had only 2% margin of error, with 48% against. The people's stupidity is why "important" questions like that should not be put to a vote; they can't be expected to unde
96.
by chii 3mo ago
> I'm afraid "age assurance" has nothing to do with "the children". and you should be afraid, very afraid. Because none of these (and other measures to invade privacy) has ever had anything to do with children.
97.
by chii 3mo ago
> as long as the same is true for human works. and it is. Anyone can study Michelangelo or Bach, and learn their style.
98.
by chii 3mo ago
Imagine an electricity generating company saying that they don't allow their electricity to be used to cold start a competitor's generator.
99.
by chii 3mo ago
Stupid things like brexit was put to a vote, but really important things such as age verification and mass surveillance are never put to any vote.
100.
by chii 4mo ago
hah, look at this guy with his keeping up with inflation talk...
101.
by chii 4mo ago
the datacenter doesn't have a few million dollars to spare. The heat is waste heat. If it cannot be recovered as a profitable source of energy, the datacenter won't be able to pay that few million dollars.
102.
by chii 4mo ago
in the attic, you discover your grandpa's steam account scribbled onto a piece of paper with the password. You try to log in, but turns out you need biometrics to access the library!
103.
by chii 4mo ago
digital goods should have a place, but the issue here is that there's no equivalent physical goods replacements. And i dont think you can regulate this away. The only force is consumer action (in aggregate). And it seems that companies
104.
by chii 4mo ago
and that is why these "AAA" games continues to decline in quality and become more anti-consumer - gamers put up with it. Spend that $100 bucks on indie games - you'd at least get 5 very good quality ones that aren't anti
105.
by chii 4mo ago
The "vote with your wallet" mantra holds here. Don't buy it.
106.
by chii 4mo ago
This is what i hate about modern corporate culture (or human culture in general perhaps). I dont want to expend effort politiking. I dont want to expend effort blowing my own trumpet. The value of my work is self-evident, but requires an eq
107.
by chii 4mo ago
Such cars are already operating in shanghai. It's not talked about much in the west media, but that's just how news is today. Achievements are only so when done by the west! Driverless car's only real obstacle is regulatory a
108.
by chii 4mo ago
> don't think Fx can survive on only us. not at the current employee and costs. But do they need to do that? Do they need to produce new products (and pay the cost to do so)? Why can't they be lean and mean? Focus purely on bro
109.
by chii 4mo ago
That's why you change it to make the pain work. This does need CEO-level cooperation to implement, but i think it is possible.
110.
by chii 4mo ago
Everybody values their own time more than other's. The fix, imho, is for the reviewers to also use ai to review the code. However, the ultimate responsibility for the outcome(s) should be on the committer - you commit it, you own it, s
111.
by chii 4mo ago
> I'm always surprised how bad ideas spread faster than good ideas among our rulers. it's not a bad idea from the POV of said "rulers" - more surveillance and control on the population is desirable (to them).
112.
by chii 4mo ago
> roughly 1B revenue per month is a good look for SpaceX this agreement between spacex and google can be cancelled with 90 days notice from either party without the other's agreement. It's purely there to make the IPO look good
113.
by chii 4mo ago
> And in China for dissent you go to a reeducation camp. that may be true, but in the US, you get shot?
114.
by chii 4mo ago
> people invest in your business, the business uses their money to achieve more that was what normally would happen. However, in the last few decades of IPO, it's become common to have two classes of shares - one being the controlli
115.
by chii 4mo ago
> a wysiwyg editor that gives you all the power of, say, CSS, and yet remains simple for simple things, sounds like a much more difficult task. so the problem is CSS isnt it? The constraints and flexibility of CSS makes it difficult to m
116.
by chii 4mo ago
And that is the perfect piece of software - it does exactly what is asked, and no more. It has simple enough "architecture" to let anyone maintain it (by adding new stuff that regulations demand, easily), and continues to function
117.
by chii 4mo ago
With AI, they fail later (during the exams), where as without using AI previously, they'd fail early and either course-correct, or drop out early (and suffer less of the consequences). Not sure what the solution is - there's no po
118.
by chii 4mo ago
The rule change where nasdaq adds a weighting factor to spacex's float is what causes distortions - it artificially increases the size of spacex's cap weight without actually having more shares. Fortunately, this only affects indi
119.
by chii 4mo ago
Without the bombs and muscle sitting behind, diplomacy is merely just talking with no results.
120.
by chii 4mo ago
which, if true, would make an arbitrage opportunity for a fund that explicitly excludes these high valuation targets but buys those trimmed companies (because for trimming to have happened, they must've been sold unwillingly and thus m

More ›