chii

16 ms·

391.
by chii 9mo ago
good thing that it would be a chinese copy, and thus, not subject to switzerland law. So i wonder if chinese law recognize this patent/trademark for a screw?
392.
by chii 9mo ago
if at first you don't see anything, try making it full screen! And then you should notice some movement/rotations. Look around, and find out where that rotation is!
393.
New DeepSeek Research – The Future Is Here [video](youtube.com)
1 points by chii 9mo ago|0 comments
394.
by chii 9mo ago
> Management drastically underappreciates the value of tribal knowledge. they may, but i think it's that they prefer if there were no tribal knowledge - because it means having irreplaceable people, which makes for weak business con
395.
by chii 9mo ago
Thank you for doing the thankless work, sensei!
396.
by chii 9mo ago
Why wouldn't those also become a target, if they would grow to be sizable? And if they have prevention mechanisms, why can't existing supply chains be secured with similar prevention mechanisms, instead of funneling to a single pa
397.
by chii 9mo ago
> It remains to be seen how China fares in the next few decades. it is easy to continue on momentum alone.
398.
by chii 9mo ago
And the idea of the percentage make up is a bit misleading, because while some things could've been 100% manufactured in america, the machines doing that manufacturing comes from china.
399.
by chii 9mo ago
> But history is littered with self-obsessed autocrats ruining a good thing. i actually dont believe that china is heading towards autocratic rule. At least, the trajectory isn't indicative of such tbh. It's dictatorial - ala,
400.
by chii 9mo ago
> The PMs are completely asleep at the wheel or, everyone has career aspirations for which they need to demonstrate impact, relevance and in shipping products. Since the current hype is AI, making and being part of the AI hype means care
401.
by chii 9mo ago
celestial objects don't need to obey algebraic commutativity!
402.
by chii 9mo ago
> One in support/service of whatever the current status quo is. Trying to set oneself apart from (or above) politics is itself political. apparently, it's OK to have this stance of "if you're not with us, you're
403.
by chii 9mo ago
yes, but i was likening being part of the proxy network to being a tor exit node. I should've made my comment clearer.
404.
by chii 9mo ago
> I fear it will become more commonly invoked. yep, but invoking it doesnt force you to accept it. The only thing you get to control is your own personal choices. That's why i am telling you not to accept it, and i hope that people
405.
by chii 9mo ago
> after they've trained a generation of folks to rely on this tech ... bias it towards favoring certain agendas previously, this happened with print media. Then it happened with the airwaves. It only makes logical sense that the tre
406.
by chii 9mo ago
> where a person can always claim that "Oh, but that was not really what I meant" that already happens today - they claim autocorrect or spell checks instead of ai previously. I don't accept these as excuses as valid (even
407.
by chii 9mo ago
The user should be making the choice - not the website. The website could be informed about being backgrounded, if the user chooses to. But the user should have the priority in the decision chain - their choice overrides any that the websit
408.
by chii 9mo ago
> Is this a re-invention of tor in a way, yes - the weakness of tor is realistically the lack of widespreadness. Tor traffic is identifiable and blockable due to the relatively rare number of exit nodes (which also makes it dangerous to
409.
by chii 9mo ago
> many anti-scraping services explicitly allow access to Google and maybe couple of other search engines. because google (and the couple of other search engines) provide enough value that offset the crawler's resource consumption.
410.
by chii 9mo ago
But then would you make the same arguments for running a tor node (presumably, you don't know what shady stuff is there, but you know there's shady stuff)?
411.
by chii 9mo ago
It's a different craft. The whole thread is about the loss of the craft of coding, to be replaced with something else different. The craft of blacksmithing is certainly different to that of dialing in a CNC, even if the outcome is both
412.
by chii 9mo ago
> It might just be a very different skillset. which is fine. Blacksmiths back in the day had craft. But they're replaced with CNC and CAD specialists, and hardly anyone bets metal today.
413.
Can a Pendulum be a Battery? [video](youtube.com)
2 points by chii 9mo ago|0 comments
414.
by chii 9mo ago
It's at least "reasonable" that if the app was where users derived usage, and would've purchased thru the app but for the external purchasing option, then apple has a case for it. However, there's no such case for w
415.
by chii 9mo ago
You do know a phone has a browser installed right?
416.
by chii 9mo ago
They could opt out - by sticking to web platforms. Apple cannot charge for that. However, apple does attempt to gimp the web platforms on mobile to "subtly" push for apps.
417.
by chii 9mo ago
You didnt calculate in the cost of failure. The success of someone being unreasonable might return good results for everyone else (but this is not known ahead of time - otherwise, it would not be considered unreasonable before the success!)
418.
The Space Propulsion Tier List [video](youtube.com)
1 points by chii 9mo ago|0 comments
419.
by chii 9mo ago
> or even Chrome reskin can't compete with Chrome? reskined chrome are still ultimately taking google's changes downstream. For a while, it may be OK, but what happens when google changes the web standards to suit themselves? W
420.
by chii 9mo ago
> Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. and only those who actually succeed being unreasonable is remembered. The other unreasonable people simply get forgotten or ignored - the vast majority.

More ›