chii

13 ms·

331.
by chii 8mo ago
> In an ideal system there would be a wiki with every option documented and when hovering over the option you'd get a short explanation and a click is a link to the documentation. doesn't even need to be a wiki, because program
332.
by chii 8mo ago
The absolute value is irrelevant - it's the opportunity cost that determines this. It doesn't matter if the consumer market is 4T, if the AI market is 60T!
333.
by chii 8mo ago
nvidia will come back to the consumer side when the AI side stops being as profitable. Right now, it still seems like the margins for AI hardware is way higher than the same consumer product would sell for.
334.
by chii 8mo ago
> But if has to be embedded into the OS that would be fine if the embedding means all applications can leverage this functionality - like how accessibility is embedded into the OS rather than per-app. The only problem is if this embeddin
335.
by chii 8mo ago
> The correct solution was automated tooling that validates the URL that's because this particular problem has a solution. The issue here is that there's no such a tool to automatically validate the output of the LLM - at least
336.
by chii 8mo ago
> rotated out to take the blame for mistakes. companies cannot rotate people out to take the blame - the company would have to suffer a fine for there to be a punishment.
337.
by chii 8mo ago
> won't solve the core problem. what's the core problem tho? Because if the core problem is "using ai", then it's an inevitable outcome - ai will be used, and there are always incentive to cut costs maximally. S
338.
by chii 8mo ago
> every year the justification is "security." when they say security, they meant security for them.
339.
by chii 8mo ago
> Dont allow systems to be built with your AI those systems will be built regardless. That type of boycott being asked from companies is essentially asking companies to not make profit where there's profit to be made, when those doi
340.
by chii 8mo ago
But the GP implied that the bank (or someone) could just alter that number, and it would become reality. I'm saying that this can't be done - at least, not without leaving such a large trail behind that it would be easily reverted
341.
by chii 8mo ago
i think you got the cause and effect the wrong way around - people are interested in van gogh's life because he's already famous (while his art can stand on it's own without needing his life story being part of it).
342.
by chii 8mo ago
> that the "money you have" is just an int32 well, luckily, that's not how money is stored, but instead, they're transaction based. Aka, that number you have is a calculated value, not a stored, arbitrary value. Excep
343.
by chii 8mo ago
> A domain using only Cyrillic characters that happen to spell a Latin word (like “аpple” in all-Cyrillic) may still render in the address bar’s font and look identical. that is very interesting. I imagine the browser could take some con
344.
by chii 8mo ago
On the other hand, i would not attribute to malice what could be reasonably attributed to stupidity.
345.
by chii 8mo ago
The artists life might've been highly affectual and shows in the art, but they doesn't mean the viewer cares about it - at best only so far as it makes the art more enjoyable.
346.
by chii 8mo ago
> But nobody would really care. no, you should say that you personally wouldn't care, but that does not generalize. People do care, just like people prefer eating better food than just bread and milk. And after having had a taste of
347.
by chii 8mo ago
> In 5-10 years and waiting for 5-10 yrs for a lower price is a long wait for consumers. If food prices were high, would you say to the starving person to wait for 5-10yrs for food?
348.
by chii 8mo ago
> People who produced the works LLMs are trained on are not compensated for the value they are now producing the value being extracted via LLM techniques is new value, which did not previously exist. The producer(s) of the old data had a
349.
by chii 8mo ago
Even you agreed that almost nobody knows what GPT stands for - which means it's as random as any other three letter acronyms. So i argue that chatGPT is indeed a good name (as good as google was).
350.
by chii 8mo ago
> said what they were trying to say in Spanish and then had ChatGPT convert it to English. It was everywhere. i'm just so surprised they'd use chatgpt to do this, when it's quite as easily (and perhaps faster) to use googl
351.
by chii 8mo ago
I mean, how is it any worse than 'google'? chatgpt is generic (as in, no prior meaning attached, except for the few people in the world who understand what GPT stands for). It's simple - even a non-english speaker can say it
352.
by chii 8mo ago
> society can be engineered and the hidden implication is that there's a correct trade off to be made (because engineering is about trade offs). So what happens to those people whose gotten the bad end of the deal? If china builds a
353.
by chii 8mo ago
Why should the desire to own more and more of the world ever come to a halt?
354.
by chii 8mo ago
> Corporate towns have existed, why not corporate nations? because they dont need to do that. They can already obtain what they want with smaller tax havens that have already established trade/tax treaties, have existing facilities,
355.
Simulating the hardest Physics Problems in Python [video](youtube.com)
2 points by chii 8mo ago|0 comments
356.
by chii 8mo ago
> But banning accounts wholesale is not going to earn them more customers. it has the chilling effect - people getting banned by google might imagine their entire google account getting banned (whether that's true or not is irreleva
357.
by chii 8mo ago
Light weight has become a marketing term that targets software developers who have gotten sick of bloat and want their software to run fast and take less resources. It used to mean a trade-off between feature rich and speed. It's been
358.
by chii 8mo ago
The technology to cull code can work for dynamic languages too, even tho it does get difficult sometimes (google closure compiler[1] does dead code elimination for js, for example). It's just that most dynamic language users don't
359.
by chii 8mo ago
but then if you could assert the call graph (easily, or even provably correctly), then why not just cull the unused code that led to vulnerability in the first place?
360.
by chii 8mo ago
> the "deep state" gets to decide whether they deserve a refund. yep. For someone who claims to be draining the swamp, this sure as hell sounds like they're digging it in even deeper.

More ›