chgs

44 ms·

841.
by chgs 2y ago
And in 5 years, or at most 10, the tories will be back in and destroy that future plan We had a future plan, it was called hs2. They were far to slow getting the diggers out, so it was cancelled for spite.
842.
by chgs 2y ago
Manchester to Liverpool and Birmingham, Birmingham to Leeds, Sheffield, Newcastle All relied on phase 2 though, freeing up capacity through Stockport and winsford, adding it for man-Liverpool/glasgow, freeing up the painful cross count
843.
by chgs 2y ago
I couldn’t believe how slow trains in Germany were last month, even before the inevitable delays. Berlin to geneva averaged 70mph. Brussels to Leipzig was scheduled even slower and ended up 2 hours late. Even the train I took from Geneva to
844.
by chgs 2y ago
Why would a hs2 user be connecting on from Euston? Or indeed from St Pancras (other than maybe Kent and Europe) But walking with a suitcase from Euston to KGSP isn’t exactly easy anyway. Only benefits to Euston are easy to get to the Victor
845.
by chgs 2y ago
This is why the important thing is diversity. The more diverse your ecosystem they less likely you are to suffer a catastrophic failure If half your tills are windows/defender and half linux/crowdstrike then half your tills are go
846.
by chgs 2y ago
Crashed? Since the start of the year CRWD is up 5%
847.
by chgs 2y ago
Long distance a lot of trains run through Birmingham. If you pick a journey between two of the top 20 urban areas cities by most direct rail routes very few go though London. There’s certainly a capacity issue though.
848.
by chgs 2y ago
Externalities are never accounted for in those randian utopias. Either that or everything concentrates into a single mega corp ownership.
849.
by chgs 2y ago
He’s in a private plane. You can fly Helsinki to Madrid which is about the same distance in about the same time with slightly less hassle than flying Vegas to Washington. There’s nothing particularly special about the US, and highlighting t
850.
by chgs 2y ago
The idea copyleft doesn’t need copyright has been dead since TiVo, you need copyright to ensure people’s freedom, if you simply repealed copyright laws you would still have your rights as a user trampled. The problem in this case is the AI
851.
by chgs 2y ago
If they want to ignore copyright great, let’s change the law so copyright only lasts say 10 years. But these companies want to have their cake and eat it.
852.
by chgs 2y ago
Not round here, massive support fur incumbant local mp even from those that vote another way at council elections
853.
by chgs 2y ago
Depends if you consider Tory as “far right” now and not a decade ago. Farage got 12.6% in 2015 and 14.3% in 2024. That’s not a massive increase. Tory vote meanwhile fell from 37% to 19% On the centre-left side, In 2015 Lib/Lab got 38%,
854.
by chgs 2y ago
Safety equipment can introduce new dangers too, both from correct use, and from refusal to use it For example a hard hat might be fine, people generally are happy with that - they see the benefit, they see things falling, job done. but the
855.
by chgs 2y ago
So many things here that might be good but without saying what you’re protecting against and what the tradeoffs are it’s meaningless. Plenty of places will offer you such lists, many of which will cause more harm than good in specific circu
856.
by chgs 2y ago
Most enterprises do
857.
by chgs 2y ago
You can buy RCE malware for Linux too - including crowdstrike. If you want a third party to manage your systems then it doesn’t matter what third party you choose Personally I’d go for diversity over any specific solution. That’s a rare thi
858.
by chgs 2y ago
I saw it a couple of days ago…
859.
by chgs 2y ago
After yesterday, CRWD is still up more than the S&P since the start of the year, and both are up insane amounts. The stock market is unrelated to reality.
860.
by chgs 2y ago
But the effects on society were far less because “online” wasn’t synonymous to “internet”
861.
by chgs 2y ago
Go to every system manually, boot to safe mode, rename the sys files, run a fix. Easier to just rebuild from the image. For every windows machine your company has. lol.
862.
by chgs 2y ago
I have never seen malware take half the worlds IT systems offline, even in the days of code red and slammer
863.
by chgs 2y ago
Because they made a continuing choice over the years to write their systems to rely on windows?
864.
by chgs 2y ago
I’m Amazed at that. I had no idea the US had caught up and had electronic payments.
865.
by chgs 2y ago
Is this just a massive mistake or is it deliberate and cover for something else
866.
by chgs 2y ago
As someone who has done this with both diesel and green hydrogen, no it’s not cheaper to run power, nor provide multi-megawatt solar provision
867.
by chgs 2y ago
That was how things worked back in the 80s and 90s, online or chip systems were in place 20 years ago in Europe
868.
by chgs 2y ago
Because you need power. And it’s not rocket science, it’s a shipping crate. The deliver system is a standard lorry, top it up with a can with some conpressed bottles in the back.
869.
by chgs 2y ago
There are times it makes sense - when you have a remote location you need power in that is more than batteries can provide for example. Say you need 300kW in a farm miles from the nearest supply for 3 months.
870.
by chgs 2y ago
It’s not too expensive to buy your own small aircraft

More ›