chewchew

6 ms·

1.
by chewchew 9y ago
Right now I wouldn't say prime now's inventory integration is any better, but I'm sure it eventually will be. Both instacart and prime now seem to have trouble determining if an item is actually in stock.
2.
by chewchew 9y ago
Graphcool is awesome. I think you guys made the right choice moving to a code-first, open-source platform. Obviously you still need to make money. Besides hosting and automatic backups, how will you monetize? What are your plans for Graphco
3.
by chewchew 10y ago
Have you ever actually used it? It does greatly improve developer ergonomics on the client side. Check out Apollo + React (or another framework).
4.
by chewchew 10y ago
In this case, a single mysql instance with individual databases may indeed be the best approach. It'd be very easy to launch a mysql container and have each wordpress container talk to it. I use Rancher for orchestration, and it autom
5.
by chewchew 10y ago
Yes that's a pretty good approach. Just organize the configs in a directory structure on your host and mount them as volumes (along with any other necessary volumes for e.g. uploaded media). There are more advanced methods like using
6.
by chewchew 10y ago
It's not one or the other. Restarting might save you some downtime if you're running a single IRC container. That doesn't mean you shouldn't find and resolve the root issue. Normally I just rollback to the previous vers
7.
by chewchew 10y ago
The absolute easiest is probably Docker Cloud. I've checked it out but haven't really used it much. It's still relatively immature but if you just want to deploy and forget something simple, this is probably the way to go. If
8.
by chewchew 10y ago
As someone said, this is the normal behavior in the Erlang/Elixir world, and it seems to have worked extremely well for the telecom industry. That said, my reply was to someone running an IRC server, presumably on a single server, so d
9.
by chewchew 10y ago
Distributed storage is still a big issue for sure. There are some options, but none are ideal. One option is to map to host and use NFS to share across hosts. Another option is to use something like Convoy or Flocker, which come with their
10.
by chewchew 10y ago
> wait. aren't these things supposed to give us less pieces to arrange and manage? No, not fewer pieces. You'll have more pieces, but you can combine the pieces and control them individually or as a group. You can think of Lego
11.
by chewchew 10y ago
You're right, it's not quite that easy yet, but it probably will be eventually. Docker just provides the building blocks. SaaS providers like Docker Cloud will get better and continue to abstract complexity away until it really i
12.
by chewchew 10y ago
I don't think that's the whole point. If all you care about is packaging your code in a container, then you don't need Docker. That was solved long ago. Docker simply adds a nice API on top which allows you to package, ship,
13.
by chewchew 10y ago
Docker gives you the building blocks, but that means you have more pieces to arrange and manage. Take a look at Docker Compose if you haven't already, since the Docker CLI only gets you so far when you're creating apps that consis
14.
by chewchew 10y ago
It's up to you to make your containers bloated or keep them slim. You can use the alpine versions of the official Dockerhub images. Python on Alpine is 30 MB (vs 267 MB for the debian one). https://hub.docker.com/r&#x