Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cheph
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
151.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> But that’s not what happened. The brand is irrelevant. It’s just math and vengeance and in the end...a lot of retail folks are going to be left holding the bag as prices drop down to earth. That cannot be a good outcome for anyone. I d
152.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
Paywalled. But the claim sounds a bit dubious. A cancer is not the same as a company, and the growth of a cancer is not the same as a growth of a company. Living things increases entropy faster than dead things[1][2], and companies or organ
153.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> by limiting financial opportunity Financial opportunity to what? Be specific. None of the examples there really makes a lot of sense in this case. You think this pump (and coming dump) happening with GameStop would convince lenders to
154.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
How does a low share price "destroy the company"?
155.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> I argued precisely that in this very thread. How is it okay to you to use "immature" and not the r-word? Both could refer to a category of person based on something they can't change about them selves, and both are in mo
156.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> Being immature means you behave immature Immature: Not fully formed or developed; not grown [1] It depends on what sense you use it in, just like the r-word. > Scolding someone for behaviour is very different than scolding them for
157.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> The economy has become so toxic that an army of retail investors has to yolo their money to try to realize an economic advantage in their lives. "has to"? really? I mean, that is quite the extreme claim. I hope you have some
158.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> immature Get your point across without stomping a category of person.
159.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
Cite?
160.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
I misread the comment I think, but either way, I am not arguing against automated tests, I was just trying to point out that for some fragments of a code base you should absolutely be able to tell correctness by looking at it.
161.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
No it does not. This is the first paragraph: > The Manhattan District Attorney's office raided Newsweek's headquarters in Lower Manhattan on January 18, 2018, and seized 18 computer servers as part of an investigation related t
162.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> I know it sounds like he’s “poisoning the well,” but this comment answered the question I had in my head. I thought the source was left-leaning but the article had a conservative voice. Comment contradicts what is in wikipedia https:
163.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> Just a reminder that Newsweek ceased publication back in 2013, and the rights to its brand were purchased by an odd Christian sect, somewhat along the lines of The Washington Times and the Reunification Church. Cite? EDIT: Seems like t
164.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
For some code you should be able to do this, and if you can't then I don't think you should be writing code. Coding is not brute forcing. I feel like this is taking an extreme position at the complete opposite end from not testin
165.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> but still thinks Google is 'as good a place as any' for passwords and bookmarks. I do think it is as good a place as any for those things, and you can encrypt bookmarks and passwords that are synced to google servers: https:
166.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> With the old CentOS you knew, that if there are breaking changes What manner of breaking changes would these be? AFAIK (may be wrong, please correct if I am) by default RHEL is not locked to minor release versions (i.e. no subscription
167.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
Will CentOS stream not be feasible for them? They can always look at No-cost RHEL for small production workloads and No-cost RHEL for customer development teams ( https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/new-year-new-red-hat-
168.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
Deep Learning does not even operate in the same space as where most of Semantic Web is being used today, some examples: - https://schema.org/ - https://www.wikidata.org/ - https://lod-cloud.net&#
169.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
Except of course CentOS stream.
170.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
The title is a bit misleading IMO. > What was the specific change? It seems that Red Hat said it would invest in Stream but not CentOS. CentoOS Stream is still CentOS to me. Better to say Red Hat will not invest in CentOS point releases,
171.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> Today, it's clear that languages and knowledge don't really work like that, and it's not practical to approach them this way. There are many applications of Semantic Web that has little to do with natural languages. If y
172.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> Talking about RDF is absolutely meaningless without talking about Serialisation (and that includes ...URGH.. XML serialisation), XML Schema data-types, localisations, skolemisation, and the ongoing blank-node war. Don't implement
173.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> The "biggest" Knowledge Graph is Google, but it is unclear, how much there is actually Semantic Web and how much search, ML, NLP etc.. The second biggest is possibly WikiData, and it is not that small. As to the practical use
174.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
Why would you presume this?
175.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
If I could not use chrome on the distro I use (fedora) I would stop using it, but that being said fedora does not actually package chrome, they just have a package to add the google-chrome yum repo, and of course you can just add it yoursel
176.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> CURIEs and the depending standards alone are well over 100 pages. The curie standard is 10 pages long, and those "dependent standards" includes things like RFC 3986 (Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax) and RFC
177.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> Why can't those Linux distributions just ship with Firefox? I don't get it. Which distro does not?
178.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> Doesn't make sense to me. Why would anyone want to have their bookmarks managed by Google if privacy is their goal. I'm pretty sure you can encrypt your synced bookmarks: https://support.google.com/chrome/
179.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
Who is not letting them pick what they want? You were not forced to use Chrome's sync features, but I am not aware of any extensions that will replace the Chromium sync functionality entirely or even mostly. And even if it did, it is n
180.
▲
by
cheph
6y ago
> Do the people who use Chromium really sign into their Google account? If that's the case, you can just as well use Chrome itself. I really don't understand why this is so surprising, if not Google's server with a google
More ›