Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chefandy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
571.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Compared to hosting other things? Nothing! It's great. Hosting my own service rather than using a free SaaS solution that is entirely someone else's problem? There's a significant difference there. I've been running Linu
572.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
A huge part of art is distinguishing between what "feels" right and what would be the case in reality. Even in the spaces I usually work in-- 3D animaton and film-- things in the background or maybe out-of-focus in the foreground
573.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
I'm sure some marketer has an email chain open with a developer asking if they can use it to help advertise bigger houses to TikTok users who film at home, or something like that. Or maybe advertise luxury products to people who are in
574.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Not that same thing, though. Reproduction isn't the purpose of considering artistic decisions you've made-- it's to reflect on and refine your eye, ability to communicate things visually, and your trajectory as an artist. Tha
575.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
If it impacted their business significantly, it would restore some of the faith I've lost in humanity recently. Frankly, I'm not holding my breath.
576.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Yeah I haven't put a new codebease on GH in years. It's kind of a PITA hosting my own gitea server for personal projects but letting MS copy my work to help make my professional skillset less valuable is far less palatable. Compan
577.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
I wonder how many people that are really mad about these guys or SE using their professional output to train models thought commercial artists were just being whiny sore losers when Deviant Art, Adobe, OpenAI, Stability, et al did it to th
578.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Nah. Whoever decided to create the reality their counsel is dancing around with this disclaimer is the actual problem, though it's mostly a problem for us, rather than them.
579.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
If people drank only to get drunk bars would go out of business instantly. A single drink made with a rail liquor pays for the whole bottle. Like it or not, sharing alcoholic beverages is a social bonding experience for many people, and for
580.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
> Neuralink Yeah, but that's not a realistic hope even among fairly wealthy Americans right now, and its many orders of magnitude less accessible to most of the world. Considering the smartphone market penetration in some profoundly
581.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
The main difference for my use case is what's usable about off-the-mark creative output to those who engage with it. With an LLM's hallucination, bullshit was made, bullshit was received, and that's that. If you figure out it
582.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
> I mean, what is the difference between creativity and hallucination (honest question)? Well, creative problem solving involves getting new ideas and perspectives by creating novel associations between things we know. Hallucinations are
583.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Baseless pessimism is exactly as useful as baseless optimism.
584.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Yes: I also think we must vocally, expressly reject anything that I don't find to be completely necessary. Other use cases == doing it wrong.
585.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Would such an attacker be stymied by this? It seems like automated email harvesting wouldn't be a big time saver for any attack that required a well-crafted anything. I don't know anything about that particular attack, though.
586.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
> If you think that scientific rigour will help you avoid the need for good judgement, you're in for a great deal of distress. Broadly, assuming more data and tighter calculations == more certainty is a folly endemic to engineerin
587.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
One of my biggest struggles in doing AI stuff on consumer hardware is heat. I noticed zero discussion of this so I assume it's an implementation detail on small systems that doesn't really factor into more robust setups. Is that t
588.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Yeah new to me, and I think I've had my fill. There are people saying things just as interesting that aren't shamelessly glib about it. As I said in my reply to your sibling comment: I'm an art school guy, so I'm well-v
589.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Yeah I hadn't actually read anything from him before, and maybe this was just the wrong piece to start on, but this doesn't inspire me to find out. The points were interesting, but not nearly enough to justify being that glib when
590.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
That wasn't true in 2017, either. Though the author makes some interesting points, he conflates catalysts, causes, and cultural movements and just calls it all self-expression, and casually makes some rather eyebrow-raising assertions
591.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
> You'd need some pretty wild sensor suites to correctly differentiate between a really good hold Ah, I see. > The AI just generates potential solutions to the problem once the holds are found/placed Yeah and I think that&#x
592.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
I think you probably need to re-read what I wrote. I'm not against AI at all-- I use it all the time. I just don't think it's going to be qualitatively better than human creative output because how something was made matters
593.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Well, I think that celebrity vs husband is not a good analog for human vs generated. I also think that in this case, origin has broader connotations than provenance, in that it includes context. What if the celebrity chef was your wife'
594.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Sure, they may well be quantitatively better. If you were to create metrics to measure the number of mistakes or weird spots or overly annoying things, it's quite possible that the output from the algorithm could score better than huma
595.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
> I wonder if AI might actually be better than humans at sequencing these kinds of problems Probably a deeply unpopular take here, but without knowing anything about climbing routes, I'm gonna say no . I'm not saying that they
596.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
> It make sense , because more people will build rental accommodation. ( They will certainly not do it if it is not profitable. ) Again, you're making a priori assumptions when there's gobs of empirical evidence that says you&#
597.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
> Article does not say that. After several paragraphs it could be implied with mention of LLC ? There is also examples given of Venia . So I would not say exclusively about US at all. Don't be obtuse. They're obviously speaking
598.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
> As I asked elsewhere, please don't be snarky. Sorry if I wasn't clear, I was distinguishing between fundamental human rights and state entitlements. I don't think laws in Finland or New York defines reality in all places
599.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
A) I don't know where your part of the world is, but this is an article about the US market on a US website. You might live somewhere with entirely government subsidized housing and it would have no bearing whatsoever on the realities
600.
▲
by
chefandy
2y ago
Nobody price gouges unless market forces let them. It simply wouldn't work. And they also didn't create the situation that allowed them to price gouge. Yet, it's still price gouging. "But the market " is not a defe
More ›