chefandy

20 ms·

271.
by chefandy 2y ago
What, exactly, distinguishes those two categories?
272.
by chefandy 2y ago
the very idea that art requiring a significant amount of deliberate action is a problem to be overcome and not part of what makes it fulfilling-- like artists have just been practicing to so they can produce more work more quickly-- betrays
273.
by chefandy 2y ago
If you're looking for video for casual personal projects or fill-ins for vlog posts, or something to make your PowerPoint look neat, this seems like a rad tool. It has a looong way to go before it's taking anyone's movie VFX
274.
by chefandy 2y ago
I’m a technical artist, so wielding tech to make art is my thing. I come from a dev background but just graduated from art school this year. I reckon there are some hurdles to overcome before seeing a lot of non-technical generative AI imag
275.
by chefandy 2y ago
Masons deliberately don't respond to these sorts of things but few things tick me off quite as much as proud, confidently administered ignorance.
276.
by chefandy 2y ago
Oh, is that what I said? Or is that what you wish I said because you had a specious response to it pre-cooked? Does your response directly address anything I said? Are you sure you're responding to me and not some conceptual 'ot
277.
by chefandy 2y ago
That’s awfully long for a headline but I do agree it’s clearer
278.
by chefandy 2y ago
Your distinction— understanding the law, broadly, and being able to try a case in court are themselves two extremes on the spectrum of people that understand law. The invective for clickbait obviously exists. None of those facts means that
279.
by chefandy 2y ago
Freemasonry only has 3 “ranks”. The organizations that have other levels, like the Shriners, York Rite, Scottish Rite (created in France in the 19th century) aren’t organizationally or legally related to any actual Masonic grand lodge — the
280.
by chefandy 2y ago
For sure. I think part of it is what happens when Dunning-Krueger strikes someone confident and charismatic enough to teach their ill-conceived ideas to others who find the idea appealing enough to take it and run with it. A runaway bullshi
281.
by chefandy 2y ago
Sure, that makes sense. Additionally, whether something is misleading had as much to do with the person reading it as the person writing it.
282.
by chefandy 2y ago
Can you propose a more appropriate one? I can’t think of one that is still headline length.
283.
by chefandy 2y ago
share the chats then
284.
by chefandy 2y ago
I agree that most readers won’t really ‘get it’ by reading the headline, and appreciate your useful addition so we all can get some context without the click, but in defense of the author, I think writing layperson-accessible headlines for
285.
by chefandy 2y ago
The approach works better with dedicated technical writers. It makes sense to have distinct user-focused goals for documents before they’re written, and then just dig into the necessary parts of the software enough to make that happen as n
286.
by chefandy 2y ago
Lots of folks in these conversations fail to distinguish between LLMs as a technology and "AI Chatbots" as commercial question answering services. Whether false information was expected or not matters to LLM product developers, bu
287.
by chefandy 2y ago
When I've gotten friend from a job they stopped being mentally classified as a coworkers and started being classified as a friend I met at work. Aside from random bullshitting about shared experiences or whatever, I rarely felt compell
288.
by chefandy 2y ago
I think that's probably ideal as a default approach. In my experience, when it moves beyond that into friendship, it's pretty organic rather than a conscious change in approach.
289.
by chefandy 2y ago
Some of the most loyal and connected colleagues I've had have been autists. I have a lot in my family so there's probably some amount of "safe person" vibes I give off, but in my experience, many autists realize the valu
290.
by chefandy 2y ago
The pre-update version of Gemini Advanced-- sold as a miracle worker-- wasted so much of my time in two small coding projects that I'll never touch it again. Constant hallucination, constant flip-flopping between the same three mistake
291.
by chefandy 2y ago
> The ease of pushing updates encourages lazy coding. Certainly in some cases, but in others, it just shifts the economics: Obviously, fault tolerance can be laborious and time consuming, and that time and labor is taken from something e
292.
by chefandy 2y ago
Thanks!
293.
by chefandy 2y ago
Taken, as recommended. It tingled.
294.
by chefandy 2y ago
If nothing else, I can confirm it’s delicious.
295.
by chefandy 2y ago
Ridiculous! Complete overreach. Be strong, oppressed one. “This too shall pass.”
296.
by chefandy 2y ago
Even if they were talking about interaction design (sometimes called IX) specifically, rather than experience design, the interaction is in handling, moving, and combining them. They don’t need to have a dynamic electronic interaction to be
297.
by chefandy 2y ago
Of course there are legitimate uses, which means everyone should have completely unfettered access and nobody selling it should be responsible for irresponsible users. Personally, I’m sick of the government limiting my artistic freedom beca
298.
by chefandy 2y ago
You’re the one that made the direct government control analogy. I mentioned a number of non-individualistic mechanisms in my previous comment. I’m not going to keep engaging in a fishing expedition of things to argue about — I think it’s pr
299.
by chefandy 2y ago
So does what I said. Someone taking pay for someone else’s work is pretty unambiguously shitty. But when you call taking anything that isn’t a physical item theft, a large percentage of people— especially in the ‘data wants to be free’ crow
300.
by chefandy 2y ago
Sure, and people that already agree with you will feel good reading it, but other people who don’t agree see it as an attack. It’s pretty much impossible to slip a new idea into someone’s mind if your approach made them slam the door before

More ›