Your distinction— understanding the law, broadly, and being able to try a case in court are themselves two extremes on the spectrum of people that understand la

Your distinction— understanding the law, broadly, and being able to try a case in court are themselves two extremes on the spectrum of people that understand law. The invective for clickbait obviously exists. None of those facts means that it’s easy, or even possible to write a headline-length blurb can give laypeople the context they need to know what’s happening. Maybe I’m wrong? Can you propose one that does?