cheeselip420

6 ms·

1.
by cheeselip420 2y ago
We are the cosmos. So of course.
2.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Its a digital headcrab, eating your attention.
3.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Legally, yes. But she could experience some consequences if future employers don't feel great about this.
4.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
It didn't fail. Sam was removed.
5.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Non profit != No profit OpenAI will be even less open now. Ilya must protect all of us from his powerful creations. Only he and his alignment team can be trusted.
6.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
No this was more of a fake-it-til-you-make-it situation
7.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Nope - it'll be sold off, with some licensing deal or some shit.
8.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Sam's push to commercialize and lockdown infrastructure is not in any way incompatible with the mission of OpenAI. Just as no one is ready for marriage or kids until it happens, we aren't ready for AGI until it happens. It will n
9.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Yeah this is really silly IMO. We know that transformers can generalize within the training set. We know that transformers can make connections between wildly different domains (at least when prompted). Of course it can't generalize b
10.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Exactly. Not all remote assists need a low-latency connection.
11.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
remote operation of vehicles often makes a lot of sense economically, since you can effectively decouple drivers from vehicles/riders. As you pointed out, this means you can shift to deal with peak loads and all of that - great. Given
12.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
I'm not saying they can't - I'm saying they are running out of time to do so, and with the DMV shutting them down they've been hamstrung further. They are burning 100s of millions every quarter. They needed to show eith
13.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Human in the loop is fine. Negative unit economics and massive expansion are not.
14.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Waymo will have challenges scaling rapidly, but they may be able to get some sort of favorable unit economics and expand more slowly. Tesla has the scale and for some reason regulators give them a pass. I wouldn't bet against Elon, bu
15.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
GM had FOMO and now it's time for FAFO.
16.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Like some sort of fucked up Ender's Game situation.
17.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Cruise is leveraging human-in-the-loop to expand faster than they otherwise would, with the hope that they will solve autonomy later to bring this down. I don't think this is a viable strategy though given the enormous costs and challe
18.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Cheaper != safer or better... But at least it's observable
19.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
you do realize that you fire people (especially those NOT adding value), you'll make more profits?
20.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
GPT-4 is 100% AGI.
21.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Why does every single language landing page not have example code? I don't want to read justifications. The code should speak for itself. Show me an echo server. Show me how you open a file and read data. Show me SOMETHING. Right
22.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Eventual consistency? Try arbitrary availability instead!
23.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
I know it decays too quickly, but I'd love to huff this shit and walk around with a permanent demon voice.
24.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Tell me you've never been to London if you think its even CLOSE to the filth of SF. No comparison.
25.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
It only matters as far as the cost to the user (including any externalities due to poor construction). The software serves the user. Period.
26.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Use R2
27.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
You could have a lidar coming in at 15Hz, a camera at 30Hz, odometry at 60 or 100Hz - but typically you'll want to plan within that same range, at least for navigation (20-50Hz). "Vastly different" is a bit of a stretch. Als
28.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Design a system to efficiently partition the state between the two? I'm not saying that message passing is bad, just that it shouldn't be the default choice...
29.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
Sure it does. I've seen teams of >100 engineers working on largely monolithic robotic codebases across several teams/companies (volumes in the 10s of thousands). Beyond that, robotics isn't all that special. There are ot
30.
by cheeselip420 3y ago
"Naturally?" lol while(true) { read sensors update world model decide what to do act } You should only deviate from this when you have a specific reason (concurrency, libraries, IPC, etc). You can attach a debugger. You

More ›