charcircuit

5 ms·

61.
by charcircuit 11d ago
Legally they are not the same thing.
62.
by charcircuit 11d ago
Hundreds of millions of American's names, addresses, social security numbers, etc were in the NPD leak which has been publicly downloadable. The idea that any of this information should be considered private, only knowable by the perso
63.
by charcircuit 11d ago
>enabled could potentially be recorded without their knowledge or consent. The audio is not recorded.
64.
by charcircuit 11d ago
What is the point of making a distro, if not to make an OS? It's the same thing.
65.
by charcircuit 11d ago
>LFS is how the rubber meets the road Again I disagree. Way too much time is spent building software than actual practical OS development.
66.
by charcircuit 11d ago
It is more how stuff is compiled than how stuff works. Fundamental things like how processes are scheduled are not explained by LFS.
67.
by charcircuit 11d ago
Aaron Swartz was not charged for violating IP either.
68.
by charcircuit 11d ago
This whole project wastes time that could be spent learning operating system design and it spends it telling users to download files, extract them, and run ./configure; make; make install 100 times.
69.
by charcircuit 11d ago
Meta doesn't allow ads in games either except for an few exceptions like YouTubeVR.
70.
by charcircuit 12d ago
But if they ban the nitter operator surely you can't just bypass that ban legally by making a new X account. That there are bans and the operator has to bypass bans by pretending to be a new person I think that this makes it different.
71.
by charcircuit 12d ago
>it isn't Google. It is Google. The JPEG XL standard evolved from a codec Google made, Google was involved in the standardization process, and Google heavily contributed to the reference implementation of JPEG XL. https:/&#x2F
72.
by charcircuit 12d ago
No, but it does the hard part of the process.
73.
by charcircuit 12d ago
>1000x faster than humans Some of the process of expanding the frontier is not parallelizable and is built on top of previous discoveries. And pushing the frontier requires doing things in the real world, or running experiments that take
74.
by charcircuit 12d ago
Washing machines, dish washers, power washers, etc exist.
75.
by charcircuit 12d ago
You have to render twice and have 2 different layers in both scenarios. Writing to a buffer / layer is not an atomic operation so they need to be separated.
76.
by charcircuit 13d ago
Because most mathematicians have not migrated to being AI native like most software engineers did. My post is trying to point out that these people's mind is still fixed in how the old world works and is not focused on the future where
77.
by charcircuit 13d ago
I disagree with the idea that they require serving both roles in order to be considered a proof.
78.
by charcircuit 13d ago
>The permissible shortcuts depend on who you are and what your values are. To solve this—to solve alignment—is irreducible complexity. This is why open source and decentralization of LLMs is important. Everyone can have their own LLM ali
79.
by charcircuit 13d ago
Having a device that can distribute ads to consumers is a distribution channel. Measuring ad impressions is a core part of ad distribution.
80.
by charcircuit 13d ago
This is why we may see the role of people wanting to advance mathematics instead of trying to do proofs themselves to push the frontier instead focus on improving these models to be capable of advancing mathematics.
81.
by charcircuit 13d ago
>The first assumption is wrong because to really solve a mathematical problem, providing a mere answer (even if formally certified) is not sufficient. What is missing is an intelligible proof that human mathematicians can understand and
82.
by charcircuit 13d ago
The market decides as it does for everything else. >When almost anyone can build software, the organizations that win will not be the ones that build the most It's not possible to A/B test a huge amount of software. The sample
83.
by charcircuit 13d ago
Are those people working on products or platforms? Platforms still have to be rock solid and deliver performance guarantees to the products built on top of them.
84.
by charcircuit 13d ago
>but a lot of folks sure like to create a strawman that anyone who wants to regulate OpenAI is somehow an EA/MIRI weirdo Anytime I see a random person on X who makes these kind of safety alarmism posts >90% of the time can be dir
85.
by charcircuit 13d ago
>I'd urge reading up on revealed preference and product discovery I'm not sure what point you are contesting. >It's worth picking this apart. They were rhetorical questions. >price-inelastic demand With this you coul
86.
by charcircuit 13d ago
>I don't recall asking Companies can develop new products without your advice. In fact consumers often don't know what they want. >people will pay whatever the price is Then why do businesses have sales? If prices don't
87.
by charcircuit 13d ago
How is it insane. Owning distribution channels has been valuable since the beginning of commerce. It's no different than a newspaper company saying they own the paper so they have the power to print ads in it.
88.
by charcircuit 14d ago
LLMs are good at finding the needle in the haystack. All efforts now should be in figuring out how to make LLMs get as good as possible at math.
89.
by charcircuit 14d ago
My phone clearly shows me when I'm on 5G vs 5G mmWave.
90.
by charcircuit 14d ago
>the world agreeing to self-destruct their valuations Did OpenAI releasing GPT-2 self destruct their billion dollar valuation or is it higher than ever today at $900B. The idea that releasing weights kills the future value that can come

More ›