4 ms·
It is more how stuff is compiled than how stuff works. Fundamental things like how processes are scheduled are not explained by LFS.
by charcircuit 12d ago
It is more how stuff is compiled than how stuff works.
Fundamental things like how processes are scheduled are not explained by LFS.
- gchamonlive 11d ago"works" is a loaded term. LFS is how the rubber meets the road, you want how the rubber is made, for that you need something like https://www.baeldung.com/linux/processes-guide https://www.baeldung.com/linux/processes-guide or https://linux-kernel-labs.github.io/refs/heads/master/lectures/processes.html https://linux-kernel-labs.github.io/refs/heads/master/lectur...
- newswasboring 11d agoAnd if you want to get to at least the bottom most visible turtle you go with something like NAND to Tetris https://www.nand2tetris.org/ https://www.nand2tetris.org/
- charcircuit 11d ago>LFS is how the rubber meets the road Again I disagree. Way too much time is spent building software than actual practical OS development.
- mid-kid 11d agoLFS is not OS development. You build a distribution by assembling all the components. If you want to develop an OS from scratch, perhaps you're looking for osdev.org.
- charcircuit 11d agoWhat is the point of making a distro, if not to make an OS? It's the same thing.
- gchamonlive 11d agoOne supports the other, they aren't laid in opposition, but they are different, well-defined disciplines
- smitty1e 11d agoOK: "How *nix tools functioned together in command-line days".