chaps

51 ms·

871.
by chaps 4y ago
Sounds lovely, but not something I would be able to do for reasons that I won't go into here. I would love to hear how you do it, though I'd understand if you can't or won't share.
872.
by chaps 4y ago
Have you been able to get something that might match a relational database? Auto-generation of a relational schema from a large dataset, or multiple datasets, is a deeply interesting idea.
873.
by chaps 4y ago
Yes, it can. It's not as simple as giving it the same prompt, but literally feeding prompts into its response like, "this is really corny sounding, nobody actually talks like that. Please write it to be more authentic. Please also
874.
by chaps 4y ago
Now that I'm not a phone, here's the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bjy5YQ5xPc
875.
by chaps 4y ago
Man, been down this path for a long while. It gets tough! Flattening csvs with hierarchical headers (as in, headers that that apply a category to a second row of headers) are tough. The ways csv can fail is just fucking nuts. Especially whe
876.
by chaps 4y ago
Wot, no. It's throw hastily we with no care of what it splats into. Pretty sure it came from a video of someone throwing something (food or drink?) in a crowded highschool hallway, from within the hallway. It's chaotic, reckless e
877.
by chaps 4y ago
The fact that you can't admit that the documentation has wiggle room for improvement here is telling. But by all means keep thinking this was a competition deserving of Ls and continue to miss the simple point. Peace and good luck, fri
878.
by chaps 4y ago
All I'm saying is they can do a better job presenting the information so these things are more readily findable. People are calling this a footgun for a reason. And no, that link isn't mentioned in the docker overview page[1]. Unl
879.
by chaps 4y ago
I want a damn mention of exactly what is changing on my system !! Why is that hard to understand and why are you trivializing such a big change? This isn't like a config file change that's OS implementation dependent. It's a
880.
by chaps 4y ago
You're being really generous to the documentation at Docker. It stinks and doesn't make it clear that it punches a hole in your firewall. Neither the compose quickstart [1], nor the compose specification [2] mention anything abo
881.
by chaps 4y ago
No need to call people simple minded, friend. It completely debases your point to the extent that it makes me question whether you understood their point. Consider the possibility that you simply misunderstood their point.
882.
by chaps 4y ago
that's word for word from: https://docs.docker.com/config/containers/container-networki...
883.
by chaps 4y ago
Maybe a lesson learned from this conversation is that the documentation isn't clear about what's going on and should be updated.
884.
by chaps 4y ago
Considering how aggressively docker has been pushed down peoples' throats over the past 10 years, from bootcamps to tutorial after tutorial teaching how to use docker... it seems pretty unreasonable to think that everybody is going to
885.
by chaps 4y ago
Wow. The rejected "east coast" emoji is.... it's a gang sign.
886.
by chaps 4y ago
I think you missed the point of their comment -- you both agree with each other.
887.
by chaps 4y ago
Thanks for the info! 8.8% still sounds like a lot, but definitely less than I was expecting. Edit: Other sources from sibbling threads say it's much, much more than 8.8%.
888.
by chaps 4y ago
Seaweed put into cattle feed also significantly reduces methane release!
889.
by chaps 4y ago
Similar happened to me. Account kept getting charged while my account was suspended because I couldn't pay the first bill. The only way to unsuspend it was to pay the full amount, including when all of the hosts were inaccessible. When
890.
by chaps 4y ago
You've missed the forest for the trees, friend.
891.
by chaps 4y ago
Man, you're pushy. Yes, it was deliberate to exclude that information, and yes they were correct in their assumption.
892.
by chaps 4y ago
Can you not? They're right.
893.
by chaps 4y ago
We could debate security daemons until our minds bleed, but.. man, I wish that all didn't happen.
894.
by chaps 4y ago
These kinds of responses shouldn't be uttered as a way of shutting down a conversation. If that's someone's intent, they are abusing their privilege. To be perfectly honest, your quote came across in that spirit. Any
895.
by chaps 4y ago
Then we agree!!
896.
by chaps 4y ago
I never said I didn't understand why the API existed.
897.
by chaps 4y ago
We can still say it was a bone-headed choice to do that because it opened a massive back door to every user's system. And? What is the problem with looking into why they made that choice before arguing that the choice should be re
898.
by chaps 4y ago
I was once told this after raising the issue that "hey maybe an API that responds with root ssh passwords is a bad idea, and our clients are going to be pissed once they find out." And.. I was right. So often, citing Chesterton&#x
899.
by chaps 4y ago
I did what I could with a handful of selenium scripts, then hit a road block because we didn't have ssh access to a chunk of the autoscaling hosts. Gave up after that, told the customer rep to tell them we can't do it, and gave my
900.
by chaps 4y ago
We weren't able to reliably install security daemons on a client's machine because the entire automation system didn't account for autoscaling. The issues were raised well before I joined and the project head legitimately did

More ›