ch0ic3

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ch0ic3 2y ago

   I screenshotted the question and pasted it in Claude 3.5 Sonnet. It answered: To determine the output of the given function for an input of 3, let's analyze the code step by step: The function is called fizzbuzz(n) and we're cons
2. 2.▲
   by ch0ic3 2y ago

   I'm struggling with the mini rant / motivation of the article: > Typically, not being Turing-complete is extolled as a virtue or even a requirement in specific domains. I claim that most such discussions are misinformed — that
3. 3.▲
   by ch0ic3 3y ago

   For sure! An argument in OpenBSD circles is that contrary to popular belief one can have security through depth. This means that even though you'll never be 100% secure you can definitely make an attacker's job harder and their
4. 4.▲
   by ch0ic3 3y ago

   For anybody wondering about the new pinsyscalls(2) suggest having a look at https://isopenbsdsecu.re/mitigations/pinsyscall/ . To be clear: I use OpenBSD on all my external-facing systems. I trust it infinitel
5. 5.▲
   by ch0ic3 3y ago

   Exciting! I was wondering when this would be released given the website said (until a few days ago it seems) it would be ready in Dec 2023
6. 6.▲
   by ch0ic3 3y ago

   Sounds similar to https://syncthing.net/ ?
7. 7.▲
   by ch0ic3 3y ago

   > mitigate some attack vector? Pretty much, if anybody can listen in on your traffic and IO is unbuffered then they can extract information about the keys pressed based on the timing between consecutive presses. There's this old LW