cgwalters

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by cgwalters 8y ago

   Bear in mind that we're basically trying to do it both ways; We still have Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and I don't think anyone would involve the term "tech stack churn" there.
2. 2.▲
   by cgwalters 8y ago

   If you're using Tectonic in particular, we're certainly aiming to have a nice path. Although there are a lot of details in the term "upgrade" - it may require reprovisioning, but a lot of the idea of carrying forward Ig
3. 3.▲
   by cgwalters 8y ago

   Thanks for bringing this up, this one had dropped off my radar. I do think that the simple concept of having `toolbox` installed by default is a powerful one, and while we should revisit some of the details I'd say we should carry this
4. 4.▲
   by cgwalters 8y ago

   The answer to this splits across the Fedora/RHEL sides. For people using RHEL Atomic Host today (and RHEL) with OpenShift, we obviously want a good transition to Red Hat CoreOS. That gets into some details though of provisioning and