Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cf498
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
31.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Overdosing isnt an unfortunate sideffect, its people making an error while dosing. An error that is easily preventable with a bit of care. The airback equivalent is very much fitting, its an emergency aid for once you made a mistake. If you
32.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Had to read up a bit, but either way i seem to have mixed something up. I did not know the French tear gas grenades also had TNT in them. But I read about such flashbang/teargas mixups before their introduction in 2011. The non french
33.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
As no one else mentioned it, depending on which country you are in, you should never try to pick up a tear gas canister shot/thrown at you as you might confuse it with a flash bang in the heat of the moment. There is a long list of peo
34.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
The US started a trade conflict due to geopolitical interests, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. The US is willing to act in their best interest, we are talking about countries acting against their best interest out of a humanita
35.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
You dont really need pellets. The pressure of a water canon is high enough to break rips and pop eyes. You dont achieve anything more by adding pellets. They do however mix in the different variants of pepper spray into the water. Some coun
36.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
No idea why this is downvoted, I think its a daring thesis that China cares what the rest of the world thinks. On top of that there are only a few countries that can afford and are willing to actually act on something like this, there is ju
37.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Being (called) a communist and having to name names in front of the HUAC wasnt that long ago.
38.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Your kids being the only ones without an tablet/smartphone is social death. Great they are not stuck to a screen, instead they will be a miserable outcast. I agree with your initial post, but the implementation is far from easy and nee
39.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I fear the timeline is way too optimistic. It wont take till 2030 to normalize. >It turns out that, like DNA evidence, there's now an entire innocence project started dedicated to getting people out of incarceration for any crime wh
40.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
We all are making choices in our life. Abusing pain medication is also a choice. If it was problem born only out of lack of information, we wouldnt have this discussion about the necessity of tighter restrictions. You only need restrictions
41.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I dont get it, can you explain?
42.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
They are still severely under prescribed in nations across the world. To the point that they are not available at all in many countries due to puritanical lobbying. Which means people across the globe are still suffering an absolute horribl
43.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
>Paper ballot boxes are just as hackable at scale with those requirements. No they arent. You need one guy with physical access to to a machine, at any time, to screw an election, with manual counting you need everyone in the room conspi
44.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
And look which 127 time Pulitzer price winner isnt above acting as a propaganda outlet. Its just sad, the headline is just the cherry on top.
45.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Awesome, thanks for clearing that up
46.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Like others have quoted, south of 20m means south of 3m. At that price tag grave digging makes complete sense if you can stem the running costs.
47.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
First of, thanks for sharing your experience and insight here. You do however see how that is a bit difficult to just accept without any backing up, considering a former engineer might naturally be a bit biased about the public perception o
48.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Do you base that on anything but a suspicion on your part? You are claiming this to be a misconception, can you actually back that up? I have no idea who those new content creators are supposed to be, like everyone else i just saw people wi
49.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I dont think there is anything problematic in simply encouraging people to vote, even if you tend to reach certain groups better. A higher voter turnout should be something to strive for, its a sign for a healthier democracy. The current ap
50.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20512199
51.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
You can simply equip those people with a tracker. Then it also works if they leave the stadium. Put them in their shoes and you dont need their cooperation either. If they dont have any just put the persons picture on the stadium screens.
52.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I think the comparison with smartphones misses the point, >You can leave your phone at home, switch it off, or put it in airplane mode. Makes it something entirely different. The core characteristics of facial recognition are 1) No need
53.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Instead of going ad hominem you could also give a counterexample
54.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
But one of the easiest to track everyone everywhere. What makes it so dangerous is its scaleability. The large error margin isnt a problem if your goal isnt finding single terrorists but create a surveillance state.
55.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I think the underlying question is, is it unethical to act morally towards immorally acting people? Not immoral actions in the past but continuing behavior? Especially once unethical actors count on you still acting morally towards them? Am
56.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
What if is the right phrase. You assume they are only looking for a specific margin, which they have to optimize for. They already optimizing to maximize the total profit. If there is a productivity increase of the workforce possible they t
57.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Without getting killed or loosing a ship once
58.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I was shocked to learn about the difference a while back, especially concerning first aid. In Germany you are facing criminal charges if you dont aid injured people, by either first aid or calling an ambulance. Then you have countries where
59.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I missed the part of the article which mentions getting matched against deepMind is opt-in in the first go through. So everything should be fine.
60.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I wonder in which way an ethics board was consulted for this. Is it ethically justifiable to introduce an anonymously "cheating" AI like DeepMind in the competitive ladder? After all > A win or a loss against AlphaStar will aff
More ›