ceol

56 ms·

511.
by ceol 14y ago
Wordpress requires a single database user that has CRUD access to the entire thing, so I'm not sure how you could benefit by separating admins and commenters. Could you give an example? I agree with your comment, though. Wordpress has poor
512.
by ceol 14y ago
They're using JavaScript onmouseover to show spoilers which can be accomplished in straight CSS2. I assume that's for IE compatibility. They're also still using <br/> tags in post comments, but I assume that's because it's easier to
513.
by ceol 15y ago
They plugged SafeShepherd which appears to be a monthly-fee service. What happens if I pay $14/mo or $65/yr, get my records scrubbed, and downgrade to the free plan? Do those "difficult records" pop up again? I went to sign up with Facebook
514.
by ceol 15y ago
> That's actually the schtick that a lot of comedians go by. Would you agree there's a difference between a comedian telling a sexist joke and a respected speaker at a tech conference telling a sexist joke? > Prefacing your comme
515.
by ceol 15y ago
"That's just fratboy behavior" and "It goes the other way" aren't excuses. Certainly not when women are severely underrepresented in the tech industry.
516.
by ceol 15y ago
How else are you supposed to change if you don't know what you're doing is wrong?
517.
by ceol 15y ago
> At the startup-focused Grow Conference in 2011, his presentation included bikini-girl images from his calendar. He prefaced the slides with a laughing, "I'm sorry for being sexist. I apologize in advance," I read this a lot on reddi
518.
by ceol 15y ago
Hopefully this doesn't cause a public scare and there aren't any fatalities.
519.
by ceol 15y ago
Do they actually have support for Premier? I would pay $5/mo to know they won't randomly disable my account (or if they do, I can talk to someone).
520.
by ceol 15y ago
I agree with this. I believe it's why .io still has 3-letter domains available, because it costs about $96/yr to register one.
521.
by ceol 15y ago
I don't think $10/yr is a lot of risk.
522.
by ceol 15y ago
>>"That project is too big, I'll never find it!" or "I'm not smart enough to understand it" That rings so true here. When I started Python web development, I needed to understand some concept related to middleware and handlers (so
523.
by ceol 15y ago
If it's anything like the "Email is dead" one, we've got some more coming. We need at least two arguing for Crockford (one with a liberal amount of "hipster" name-calling), someone arguing for @fat, and @fat eventually explaining himself (b
524.
by ceol 15y ago
You will never produce code that works for 100% of users and situations.
525.
by ceol 15y ago
I felt the same way. Once I got to @pyalot actually belittling @shawnpresser's JSMin fix, I realized just how religious and immature this debate had become.
526.
by ceol 15y ago
This is such a cool implementation. Would you be willing to do a write up about how you got the basic tabletop functionality working? I see on your acknowledgements page[0] you use NodeJS and ShareJS. I assume you do JSON object editing lik
527.
by ceol 15y ago
What I'm saying is even if the content is legit, you don't interrupt someone during their presentation. User smacktoward says this rather well further down in this submission's comments:[0] > "Was Katz right?" is not the most important
528.
by ceol 15y ago
> If the original presenter could effectively support his position then he would not have left the stage. I don't think so. They may not have been seasoned public speakers like Katz, so having someone outright argue with them during t
529.
by ceol 15y ago
I don't think Katz was merely asking questions. From the article: > Speaker: Talk talk talk talk. Talk talk talk? Demo demo demo. > Katz: Wait, why are you doing it that way? You should be doing it this way. [...] Katz plugged
530.
by ceol 15y ago
For some reason, decorators didn't click for me until now. I've been parroting the standard decorator logic (e.g. returning a function) without knowing why. Thanks!
531.
by ceol 15y ago
> I have no idea what you mean by "what SQLAlchemy does" You must have missed the rest of that paragraph. I specified what it does. > What he's talking about here is known and talked about for 10 years. It's just function names,
532.
by ceol 15y ago
PHP doesn't allow you to pass functions and classes as arguments.
533.
by ceol 15y ago
> How that even makes sense? Maybe my point wasn't clear. It's not a difference in how those two ORMs accomplish their goal; it's that PHP doesn't let you do what SQLAlchemy does, even if you wanted to . Want to write an ORM that u
534.
by ceol 15y ago
> You've turned something that's a person's fault into something that's the language's fault. > You're taking a look at other people's code, and judging the language from it. At some point, you have to start blaming the language
535.
by ceol 15y ago
> PHP makes it extremely easy to write ANY code. No. PHP makes it easy to write bad code and between normal and challenging to write normal code. This is why Doctrine , the closest thing PHP developers have to SQLAlchemy, needs three
536.
by ceol 15y ago
> So your complaint is that when you use @ to suppress an error it... suppresses the error? From your edit, you've only been working with PHP for about 6 months, so you may not have seen some of the code most others have. Can you imag
537.
by ceol 15y ago
I enjoy Eevee's posts. I was first introduced to him through a handful of Pokémon sites where users would reverse-engineer the Pokémon games and protocols. He writes good code and knows his stuff. He even offered some assistance when I was
538.
by ceol 15y ago
> especially if the company that wants to use it is a big enough company to have a budget to sell 20,000 calendars. This is what I don't get. The budget for the images — the reason people would buy the calendar in the first place—
539.
by ceol 15y ago
From what I've noticed, you only get it for the comments on articles since you passed the threshold. You're unable to downvote old comments.
540.
by ceol 15y ago
He says he's receptive[0] but then dismisses every con listed with either, "Suggest an alternative,"[1] or, "Give me some form of evidence that I won't dismiss."[2] As another user said,[3] there's just far too much going on when it should

More ›