cell303

6 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by cell303 13y ago

   Does anybody dare to argue that angry birds did provide more value to peoples lives than a cure for cancer? Why is it so obvious that curing cancer is the right thing to do as opposed to engaging in economic and cultural activity, which has
2. 32.▲
   by cell303 13y ago

   same here
3. 33.▲
   by cell303 13y ago

   I experience this right now! The saddest paragraphs were "Time to change" and "Learning from your mistakes", where he basically says that he is doing the same thing under a different name with the same lack of results :(
4. 34.▲
   by cell303 13y ago

   I really dislike the unit test and integration test analogy. It is based on the assumption that the human body has something in common with a computer program - or anything man-made for that matter. This is clearly not the case. We tend to
5. 35.▲
   by cell303 14y ago

   Another way to read this article would be as follows: There has to be something big out there ready for us to build. Now consider (just consider) that one does not necessarily need a "plan" or a "theory" to build things, one should def
6. 36.▲
   by cell303 14y ago

   I don't like the biology argument. It sounds as if we would care about our biology in any other respect. The whole tech industry is about extending our human capacities beyond our natural limitations, fitting low-testosterone entities (aka