Does anybody dare to argue that angry birds did provide more value to peoples lives than a cure for cancer? Why is it so obvious that curing cancer is the righ

Does anybody dare to argue that angry birds did provide more value to peoples lives than a cure for cancer? Why is it so obvious that curing cancer is the right thing to do as opposed to engaging in economic and cultural activity, which has been the norm for mankind as long as we have been around? (and by the way provides the social stability that is the very basis for any kind of progress at all) What's worse is the implication that there is a cure for cancer and all it would take is a few talented entrepreneurs to tackle the problem in an directed effort (which, to my knowledge, is happening anyway but with limited success while chemo therapy is still around, which was a by-product of war efforts)