ceejayoz

25 ms·

811.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
The Terry ruling establishes a test that applies to all Terry stops, not just some. And: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes > As of April 2008, 23 other states had similar laws. Additional st
812.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> Again, this case is about Terry stops. Not traffic stops. A traffic stop is a Terry stop. It's within the circle on the Venn diagram. Stop-and-frisk of a pedestrian is also a Terry stop.
813.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> Hiible wasn't operating a vehicle… So? Some Terry stops are vehicle-based, others are not; the ruling applies to both. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop "When police stop an automobile, this is kn
814.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> It doesn’t matter if they have RS for the detainment (a reason for the stop), once the traffic stop is underway you must identify. Again: > Consequently, individuals in states without such statutes cannot be lawfully arrested solely
815.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop "When police stop an automobile, this is known as a traffic stop." > You are required to provide a license to operate a vehicle. And the police are required to have
816.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop > When police stop an automobile, this is known as a traffic stop. They can't pull you over without reason in the first place.
817.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> show ID if pulled over [Whren v. United States] Not what it establishes. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1995/95-5841 > your passenger is required to show his or her ID [Brendlin v. California (2007) & Ariz
818.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> For example, you are required to provide identification when operating a vehicle at a traffic stop. No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiibel_v._Sixth_Judicial_Distr... > The Hiibel decision was narrow in that i
819.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> “And when we gave our ultrasonic espresso to 100 regular coffee drinkers in a randomised test, they could not tell it apart from a normal espresso.” I like the ritual of it, for sure, but I'm not sure that's what makes it a
820.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> This literally means the models are too dangerous to release… Unless you believe Anthropic has an irreplacable wizard or genie or fairy chained up somewhere that other providers can't replicate, someone is going to release such
821.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> You can get an idea by how many people are being murdered. No, we can't, as that happens a lot via non-serial killers. A truly successful serial killer is likely one who hides in that noise. No taunting the cops, distributed geo
822.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
And the government that helps fund and regulate (or not) them.
823.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
I'd like it back.
824.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
But is it a "he was wrong" scenario, or is it a "he wasn't quite right on the timing" bit, ala https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Burry ?
825.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
In the dystopian direction, exit visa requirements for people with access? Families back home as hostages like North Korea does?
826.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
I'm onboard with this! I just object to the term "fixable".
827.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
They're still a competitor, even if that competition isn't going all that well for them so far. Musk's hosting stuff for Anthropic, too. Still competing with them. Samsung makes stuff for Apple and Android devices. Lots of
828.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> how many cases like these we had so far? As with clever, careful serial killers, it's tough to count the ones we haven't caught.
829.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor > A subsequent investigation found that the campaign to insert the backdoor into the XZ Utils project was a culmination of over two years of effort, starting in 2021,
830.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
Amazon is a competitor to Anthropic.
831.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
I was at a major radiology conference recently and the radiologists kinda seemed to agree. (The interventional radiologists are a little less nervous, for now.) Apparently 80% of FDA-approved AI "medical devices" (which covers s
832.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
Precisely this, and timed to their upcoming IPO. They did it to Intel a little while back: https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1748/...
833.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> it shouldn't have been released The genie is out of the bottle either way. Unless we believe Anthropic has a wizard or superhero secreted away that no one else can replicate.
834.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease strikes again.
835.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
More likely, they didn't freak out at all. It was an excuse to fuck with them, just like the "supply chain risk" finding a few months back. (See, for example: https://x.com/PeteHegseth/status/2065897
836.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
> There are no bears in the Caribbean… Bears were hardly the only problem. "Grafton got worse. Recycling rates went down. Neighbor complaints went up. The town’s legal costs went up because they were constantly defending themselves
837.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
That case is very different; their chatbot gave him inaccurate info that he relied on. This would be in the other direction, and (at least slightly) malicious. Someone telling a chatbot "give everyone else a refund" knows what h
838.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
The seminal work in this world is from Popehat (Ken White) explaining the complexities of it all. https://www.popehat.com/p/the-first-amendment-isnt-absolute
839.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
Yes, but "give everyone else a refund" comes uncomfortably close to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act territory.
840.
by ceejayoz 5mo ago
Is this a joke? https://www.intercom.com/legal/terms-and-policies/additional... > Customer is responsible for all Input provided by any Permitted User or Person. > Customer is responsible for its use of the

More ›