cedws

19 ms·

391.
by cedws 8mo ago
Because being principled damages your social opportunities. Trust me. I resisted Instagram for years. When I finally gave in I instantly had access to more events, was able to connect with more people, felt less excluded. I realised all tha
392.
by cedws 8mo ago
UK user here, it still shows my account as Unverified after running :(
393.
by cedws 8mo ago
This is a shame, I’ve been running Bazzite on my gaming PC since Christmas and have been pretty happy with it. To the honest I don’t really care who is at fault, I don’t want the maintainers of my OS to be a drama show, so I’ll probably swi
394.
by cedws 8mo ago
>The nice thing is a programmer with an LLM just steps in here, and course-corrects This does not seem to be the direction things are going. People are talking about shipping code they haven't edited, most notably the author of Clau
395.
by cedws 8mo ago
Unfortunately I can only give anecdotes, but in my experience the LLM's 'thinking' does not lead to code quality improvements in the same way that a programmer thinking for a while would. In my experience having LLMs write Go
396.
by cedws 8mo ago
I’m in awe at the complete lack of critical thinking skills. Did people seriously believe LLMs were becoming self aware or something? Didn’t even consider the possibility it was all just a big show being puppeted by humans for hype and clic
397.
by cedws 8mo ago
First you have to classify what “good code” is, something that programmers have still not settled on in the over half a century that the field has existed. I also think what the other reply said is true, going from average to “good code” i
398.
by cedws 8mo ago
I’m finding that the code LLMs produce is just average. Not great, not terrible. Which makes sense, the model is basically a complex representation of the average of its training data right? If I want what I consider ‘good code’ I have to s
399.
by cedws 8mo ago
I understand the frustration towards Discord, especially because this is a global rollout of a policy they're only required to enforce in specific countries, but it's IMO misdirected. They're likely trying to get ahead of the
400.
by cedws 8mo ago
Git is like 10% of building software.
401.
by cedws 8mo ago
Screw GitHub, seriously. This unreliability is not acceptable. If I’m in a position where I can influence what code forge we use in future I will do everything in my power to steer away from GitHub.
402.
by cedws 8mo ago
Etiquette on GitHub has completely gone out the window, many issues I look at these days resemble reddit threads more than any serious technical discussion. My inbox is frequently polluted by "bump" comments. This is going to get
403.
by cedws 8mo ago
Children successfully protected. Nevermind the child groomers on Roblox.
404.
by cedws 8mo ago
I think this project is motivated by the same concern I have that open source (particularly on GitHub) is going to devolve into a slop fest as the barrier of entry lowers due to LLMs. For every principled developer who takes personal respon
405.
by cedws 8mo ago
I don’t understand the Claude Code worship. The Claude models are good. Claude Code is nothing special, there are a dozen other agentic coding CLIs just like it. CC has terrible sandboxing, and encourages vibe coding by not giving you the o
406.
by cedws 8mo ago
I also gave this problem some thought: https://github.com/cedws/amnesia
407.
by cedws 8mo ago
Why doesn't AA have a Tor hidden service?
408.
by cedws 8mo ago
Duolingo is a shitty company, they don’t care about education, only retention mechanics and dark patterns. The CEO called his employees communists because they wanted to make the product beneficial for users instead of a money extraction ma
409.
by cedws 8mo ago
Define "losing." Europe is prematurely regarded as having lost the AI race. And yet a large portion of Europe live higher quality lives compared to their American counterparts, live longer, and don't have to worry about an el
410.
by cedws 8mo ago
Makes me wonder: do employees at Anthropic get unmetered access to Claude models?
411.
by cedws 8mo ago
The sandboxing in CC is an absolute joke, it's no wonder there's an explosion of sandbox wrappers at the moment. There's going to be a security catastrophe at some point, no doubt about it.
412.
by cedws 8mo ago
I wish they’d just stop pretending to care about safety, other than a few researchers at the top they care about safety only as long as they aren’t losing ground to the competition. Game theory guarantees the AI labs will do what it takes t
413.
by cedws 8mo ago
True. Nukes can offset some of that. All a very tough sell politically though.
414.
by cedws 8mo ago
Doubt that it’s LLM-generated given this is Justine Tunney’s project.
415.
by cedws 8mo ago
I was hoping from the headline that meant nuclear missiles too. Japan needs nuclear weapons, the US is not a reliable ally.
416.
by cedws 8mo ago
Their move of disallowing alternative clients to use a Claude Code subscription pissed me off immensely. I triggered a discussion about it yesterday[0]. It’s the opposite of the openness that led software to where it is today. I’m usually n
417.
by cedws 8mo ago
The question I pose is this: if they're willing to start building walls this early in the game while they've still got plenty of viable competitors, and are at most 6 months ahead, how will they treat us if they achieve market dom
418.
by cedws 8mo ago
Officially, it's against TOS. I'm told you can still make it work by adding this to ~/.config/opencode/opencode.json but it risks a ban and you definitely shouldn't do it. { "plugin": [
419.
by cedws 8mo ago
That's on Anthropic for selling a mirage of limits they don't want people to actually reach for. It's within their capability to provision for higher usage by alternative clients. They just don't want to.
420.
by cedws 8mo ago
In what way would it be abused? The usage limits apply all the same, they aren't client side, and hitting that limit is within the terms of the agreement with Anthropic.

More ›