cdx

4 ms·

1.
by cdx 15y ago
Good day to you too.
2.
by cdx 15y ago
"Its pretty clear.. that you are a SHILL (or a community fan of LowEndBox) as you phrase it... whatever you want to call it. your impact is still negative and the same." Open community, ne? "I find it highly suspicious that your ACCOUNT STA
3.
by cdx 15y ago
Nope, just a community fan. I'm sure you/others would do the same to defend this site if it came under attack for something you deem as non-valid. There is only one person who works for LEB and that is LEA.
4.
by cdx 15y ago
Of course any VPS can host 18 static sites. The main point is even one with as little memory as 64mb can host static sites, whilst the majority opinion over at WHT is that it wasn't possible. I'm sure the OP of the WHT post wasn't intending
5.
by cdx 15y ago
Why must you assume that is spam? It could very well be from the front pages of LEB.
6.
by cdx 15y ago
Have a look at this thread - http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=765561 . The title of the blog post retorts what is generally said in that thread (No, you can't run 18 static sites on a 64mb VPS). It's a (more detailed) reply
7.
by cdx 15y ago
Nah, just a supporter of LEB. If you actually looked at the post in a sensible way you'd come to the same realizations.
8.
by cdx 15y ago
Hostigation. Another good one would be BuyVM at $15/y =)
9.
by cdx 15y ago
I do see your point, but I think the little more time setting things up manually is worth it in the end rather than using more memory (or needing a higher tier VPS)
10.
by cdx 15y ago
Nope. Try again, bro. The host mentioned was in the original thread that this blog post was a response to.
11.
by cdx 15y ago
"Kinda." The article says it might be possible to take it one step further to run a low volume wordpress/basic PHP install.
12.
by cdx 15y ago
Agreed. Using apache on a lowendbox is not a smart idea. Lighttpd serving static sites takes ~5MB in practise. That's also including a SSHd and other services.
13.
by cdx 15y ago
The title at the top was because (if you read the article) the blog post spurred from a post on WebHostingTalk asking the community if it was possible to host 18 static sites on a 64MB VPS. A lot of people said no, so this post was made to
14.
by cdx 15y ago
Have a look at BuyVM.net - $15/ year for 128MB.
15.
by cdx 15y ago
This article is more aimed to the type of user who would use a command line interface. If they require cpanel, they should look elsewhere. Negating this article because of a potential user deficiency is ludicrous.