cced

15 ms·

151.
by cced 3y ago
I’ll be exploring a combination of pre-processing such as stemming in order to also reduce the token length while preserving as much important information. Thanks for the feedback. Edit: Won’t the sliding window solution above introduce a s
152.
by cced 3y ago
Thank you very much for this comment. I just recently started dabbling with "AI/ML" by having Youtube videos transcribed and summarized. I was pretty amazed to see that I could simply 'plug' an .mp3 of audio and hav
153.
by cced 3y ago
Is any of this open source? I just recently started experimenting with summarization of youtube video audio that has been passed through openai/whisper and to my surprise I’m told that the maximum token lengths are in the 1k range. I f
154.
by cced 3y ago
If this is true then the system is clearly made to funnel these lands into the hands of the ruling oligarchs.
155.
by cced 3y ago
Probably a joke of _poor taste_ but my guess is lead.
156.
by cced 4y ago
I don't understand this take. What if Yellen's intention was to get a nice payout? What if, instead of a good actor making a bad choice you simply have a bad actor that is engineering their way into positions that would later bene
157.
by cced 4y ago
This weekend, J. was Tweeting about: 1. firearms 2. people needing to be terrified 3. bank runs If you're of the opinion that their Tweets (ignoring what may or may not have happened in certain private chats leading up to) did not lead
158.
by cced 4y ago
You're egging and reducing a website because it has leftists on it while the paragons of personal responsibility, efficient markets, and the banking system are having a meltdown and getting a bailout. Remind me again what government ha
159.
by cced 4y ago
> This is not the end of the world. Someone hasn't been following @Jason's Tweet fest this weekend.
160.
by cced 4y ago
Can someone shine some light on[1][2]? If true, it would seem that some of this panic would have been engineered in order to save VC capital at the expense of the rest of us? --- edit: We really need an analysis of @Jason and @DavidSacks w.
161.
by cced 4y ago
> You should be happy in the way an apartment's occupants are happy when the fire department puts out a fire in a different apartment in the building, even though it "didn't affect my apartment." We're being spoo
162.
by cced 4y ago
> It's slightly disheartening to see so many people on HN willing to invite a wider collapse of the US banking system in order to punish/hurt a group of people they deem to be "elite". People are tired of being around
163.
by cced 4y ago
You’re right, they aren’t. They are being used as meat shields for the banks failure. They are used as collateral damage because it is absolutely unfathomable that a bank use deposits to hedge against interest rate sensitive bets. Yet here
164.
by cced 4y ago
Okay? I’m trying to buy my first home, who’s going to give me a home? Another bank is getting a bailout and they have the gaul to call it not-a-bailout bailout? This is all so silly. You’ve got the 4 musketeers on twitter sewing fear, beggi
165.
by cced 4y ago
I think OP's point is the introduction of limits to the benefit of owning multiple properties. Hard to see OP replying with "Oh gosh, darn it you got me again" as a response to your comment and much more likely to further dev
166.
by cced 4y ago
> American is so rich and powerful precisely BECAUSE it maximizes efficiency and capital. > I bet you also think that cutting executive salaries would somehow make major corporations like McDonalds be able to pay all of their workers
167.
by cced 4y ago
You're trying to portray people that joke about war as though they are trying to bring a thoughtful discussion. They aren't and you aren't being helpful by muddying the discussion by presenting them as such. These are reddit
168.
by cced 4y ago
Do people really have to say that jokes about war which inevitably lead to the death of many in order to have bigger and better phone batteries at a reduced cost is sickening?
169.
by cced 4y ago
He’s serving someone’s, somewhere’s interest.
170.
by cced 4y ago
> Hiring and firing people who are only seen as "resources" when needed is efficient from a business point of view. 1) To entertain this point, maybe? If your optics of the situation was efficiency for the company, but why woul
171.
by cced 4y ago
> if your politicians is giving away your tax money to corporations then the solution isn't to give those politicians even more money or power Please. Lobbying + gerrymandering > deregulation > look ma, government inefficien
172.
by cced 4y ago
> What's the alternative? Other than more scrutiny and harsher punishments for banks, which very few people are against. Few people are against it, yet we didn't hear about too many bankers getting sent to the locker, did we? &
173.
by cced 4y ago
> It's mistakes are always covered by taxpayer money, effectively punishing those who are efficient. The government also covers bailouts for banks using taxpayer money, effectively punishing everyone. > Why are we always comparin
174.
by cced 4y ago
Violin or not, OP's post was regarding corporate efficiency. Reading any headline over the last few weeks will show you that corporations over-hired and are laying off workers. I guess blood is blood, regardless of who's it is. Cu
175.
by cced 4y ago
> At least private business pays for with blood for it's mistakes. > The beauty of capitalism is that it allows society to thrive even when all actors are irresponsible. Which we, humans, are. I think the laid off tech workers an
176.
by cced 4y ago
I'm not sure I understand the question, you can create tables/views based on others that have the transformations applied to them, tools like dbt[1] make this easy. [1]: https://www.getdbt.com/
177.
by cced 4y ago
Do you have any recommendations for pull-thru caching? I’m currently going through this issue as we speak and am very interested in having this work for our usecase.
178.
by cced 4y ago
> Russia has no motive because they would harm themselves. Ok? You’re stating that they don’t not have motive, so what’s the motive? Why would Russia throw away part of it’s cards? What’s the play?
179.
by cced 4y ago
> it seems like employer-subsidized housing isn't a terrible idea, and is an alternative to just relocating corporate offices to a lower CoL area. Would this be in a way similar to how we've tied health care to employer-based i
180.
by cced 4y ago
Sounds like Google is finally reaping the benefits of all those shutdowns.

More ›