cb14

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by cb14 4y ago

   Put two and two together, if they are saying the risk benefit from the shots is negative for children who aren’t at risk from the virus, then don’t you think the same would apply to adults who aren’t at risk from the virus? The extent to wh
2. 2.▲
   by cb14 4y ago

   It sets a good precedent, the shots aren’t safe or effective. Does everyone have amnesia about how these things were sold? They were supposed to stop the virus cold. So much for that. It’s a very good precedent. It wasn’t supposed to be an
3. 3.▲
   by cb14 4y ago

   It’s not about expense, it’s about safety and efficacy, the shots aren’t safe.
4. 4.▲
   by cb14 4y ago

   I don’t think the original title was misleading. It says on the page: Who will be offered vaccination against covid-19? People aged 50 years and over will be offered vaccination. People aged under 50 who are at a higher risk of becoming s
5. 5.▲
   by cb14 4y ago

   Danish health authorities still recommend everyone to get vaccinated against COVID, including healthy people under 50. Everyone should get two jabs, everyone over 18 should get a third "booster" shot. The vaccine talked about in