causalmachine

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by causalmachine 10y ago

   An atheist provides scientific evidence of God's existence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SasizIMHKOI , based on numerical codes via 'illustris'. This is however evidence of a NON-omnipotent God, unlike t
2. 2.▲
   by causalmachine 10y ago

   bunny.jpg? I think not.
3. 3.▲
   by causalmachine 10y ago

   Suffering appears as a quintessential natural function, that is minimized as time diverges...
4. 4.▲
   by causalmachine 10y ago

   For I am "causalmachine". The original story regards Elon's "biological boot loader lamentation", which is likely. To clarify, I haven't any belief, and therein I have not any belief in God or gods. (As specifi
5. 5.▲
   by causalmachine 10y ago

   Nonsense. I haven't any belief, and therein I have not any belief in God or gods. (As specified in my github url, entitled "God") However, I maintain that mankind shall perhaps attain God-like PROPERTIES. We are simulating mo
6. 6.▲
   by causalmachine 10y ago

   Precisely.
7. 7.▲
   by causalmachine 10y ago

   Words via author: I had years prior sought to axiomatically describe consciousness. In reducing the problem, I had encoded a naive, minute ("minoot") function: c = ⌈P∞⌉ᵘ•σm …whence “⌈P∞⌉” symbolizes some perceptual vector bundle,
8. 8.▲
   by causalmachine 10y ago

   To summerize iandanforth's longueur: Togelius' work ignores a core paradigm, of which we are aware of the human brain; neuroplasticity. If one of togelius' solvers fails, all bets are off, the artilect is lobotomized. See dee