catssie

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by catssie 6y ago

   You literally think you are making a coherent argument that doesn’t collapse in on itself?
2. 2.▲
   by catssie 6y ago

   It’s literally a non-argument designed to not even consider my position and talk over it with flights of fancy. Every decision is based on incomplete information, ever. Your argument is an argument against the very state of knowing. It’s D
3. 3.▲
   by catssie 6y ago

   “Do not wait to strike till the iron is hot; but make it hot by striking.” If you want change, make lasting change.
4. 4.▲
   by catssie 6y ago

   Whom? Well, the greatest number of people possible. All time frames. All scopes. You philosophers always trying to confuse the simple.
5. 5.▲
   by catssie 6y ago

   Justifying murder, no.
6. 6.▲
   by catssie 6y ago

   No.
7. 7.▲
   by catssie 6y ago

   If you want to maximize ethical utility, pick the course which reduces the greatest amount of suffering. Prognosticators not required.
8. 8.▲
   by catssie 6y ago

   Every time I am wrong, I rejoice, because it means I learned something new, I just objectively became less dumb. Ego is the bane of learning. Smart people with ego usually aren’t as smart as you think, it’s usually more luck, performance, a