Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
catskul2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
catskul2
3y ago
Not really a contradiction so much as redundant/poorly worded. Should have said, "at least 4 million tokens".
32.
▲
by
catskul2
3y ago
Perhaps you'll categorize this in the first group, but I've found Robert Miles' arguments/videos to be convincing, and he was talking about it before it became particularly fashionable to do so: https://www.yo
33.
▲
by
catskul2
3y ago
Since this is on arxiv one presumes it's not been peer reviewed yet, right? Is there a way to leave comments? There are a couple of confusing language/grammar mistakes including some in the first sentence.
34.
▲
by
catskul2
3y ago
My brain does not like the phrase "social compact" probably because I've heard "social contract" so often, and rarely if ever hear "compact" used in this way. On the other hand I hear "pact" much
35.
▲
by
catskul2
3y ago
> is this class of code that you have to run a single time to know it works Not sure what you're trying to say here.
36.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
To me "we have no idea how" != "this is not fixable" (and even "we have no idea how" even seems like a strong statement.) Perhaps it's because I'm ignorant about the inner workings, but calling the pr
37.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
What's "Tidy First"? Is this a book I should have heard of?
38.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
It's not clear why this would be a fundamental limit rather than a design flaw that will eventually be solved.
39.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
> need to be replaced by a better solution. Which is...?
40.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
> ...Unadulterated tobacco, such as what pipe smokers use, does not actually cause cancer > ...causes cancer at the same rate as with them I think they're referring to your original claim that tobacco smoke, without additives, do
41.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Why is this article here (or even written for that matter).
42.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Given GPT's tendency to "hallucinate information"/lie, how much "hallucinated" material should we expect to hear in such a podcast?
43.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
They have and do regularly describe it in those terms to patients.
44.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
> we shouldn’t forget that schizophrenia is mostly social and psychological in origin While it's not possible to completely decouple biological and social risk factors, my understanding of schizophrenia is in direct contradiction wi
45.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
I really like the picture at the top, was that the work of stable diffusion?
46.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Could you compare/contrast its functionality to https://github.com/KDE/heaptrack ?
47.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
I think that's the point they were making.
48.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Would the state of those buildings or roads be expected to be there? Or is this simply completing the data so people can more easily refer to it in OSM if they want to?
49.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
I don't quite understand what this project does, for example, in the case of the earthquake in Turkey. Does it designate fallen buildings, and unusable roads? If so how does one access this info. I spent about 10 minutes on hotosm and
50.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
I feel statements like: "...team leads (and managers) allow comments to get out of sync with the code..." reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of how software organizations generally work.
51.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
If you haven't already, read "the 3-body problem".
52.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Which people are not intrigued by this?
53.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
I get what you're saying about "mechanically" but "cargo cult" does not work as an analogy here.
54.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
I interpreted that as "for investors". Basically reassuring them that the org is not bloated, or improving the raw numbers so anyone using heuristics based on those numbers is made happy.
55.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
There are so many boilerplate disclaimers that are meaningless, how can you possibly ask this question? If you stuck to "didn't you agree with that policy" perspective, you'd never get in a car, on a plane, or buy anythi
56.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
You seem to be arguing any tools and languages made after the moon landing are trivial unless the project is "more complicated than the moon landing". Is that the argument intended to make?
57.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Why is that bad?
58.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Clearly not the case. A very large number of people use these sorts of flows without problems coordinating or explaining.
59.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Not the OP, but the alternative requires that either: - "Me fail English." is considered to be a well formed construction, or that... - ...adding a conjunction is important in determining whether "I" or "Me" is
60.
▲
by
catskul2
4y ago
Not at all trivial. If it seems that way to you, then it's likely that you simply haven't worked on a project with the scale and workflows which require this.
More ›