catshirt

22 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   > Most people are, by definition, of nearly average intelligence that's... optimistic. doesnt that also mean half the population is below average intelligence?
2. 182.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   depends on the goal, right? considering they want to limit APM in the SCII model- we can assume that goal is something like "beat a human under human conditions". in that case yes, communication needs some limitation. but this see
3. 183.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   restricting controls while typing is an arbitrary restriction considering they can communicate with audio asynchronously. this brings up another interesting topic all together- which is how inefficient human language is at communicating com
4. 184.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   you are oversimplifying things and ignoring a lot of variables. just to illustrate a point: on a sufficiently large map, i could have four times as many workers by the time your first set reaches my spawn. if i'm playing Protoss agains
5. 185.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   like https://github.com/mozilla/shumway ?
6. 186.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   so like, you just don't go to any websites ever? or what?
7. 187.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   sounds like it has not faded at all...
8. 188.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   rollback both to a working combination? in your analogy, it would be equivalent to Samsung putting its previous phone back into production.
9. 189.▲
   by catshirt 10y ago

   something like that, yeah. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps_v_Apple_Computer though, in your example, i'd have to wager the Windows trademark extends way further than just "operating systems". &
10. 190.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    why would you need to simulate that problem? the answer is yes- you can miss a green light if someone accelerates too slowly.
11. 191.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    thanks! my rudimentary understanding was pretty much correct... it sounds, then, like shareholders simply don't have faith in the acquisition?
12. 192.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    ok but, doesn't it ideally increase AT&T's value over time (else why would they be acquiring)? meaning, if the acquisition goes as planned, wouldn't you be better off holding onto AT&T?
13. 193.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    i don't know shit about stocks- can someone explain why AT&T stock dropped 5% and Time Warner increased 12.5% off the news?
14. 194.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    i've been using webpack for like 3 years now. hasn't changed- besides my boilerplate getting smaller over time. it's a 5 line .rc file now. ignore the noise. if we are making an apples to apples comparison, React does not nee
15. 195.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    1. i can't agree. it's possible to integrate React into your application one component at a time. how is Vue "much simpler to mix in"? 2. i think this depends on your background. if you've had the pleasures and disp
16. 196.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    nothing about React is messy or sloppy. it is the exact opposite. the notion that your view logic and it's template must be completely decoupled is an antiquated and misguided best practice.
17. 197.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    it's not uncommon. someone has to make a decision and it makes sense early managers are not best suited to make technical decisions. as a company or application grows technical deficiencies resulting from bad choices will start to rear
18. 198.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    but how they use your application is not a reflection of how they use the web at large. i'm not surprised by your study's result, I'm just not sure you can extend your conclusion to believe that people won't or can'
19. 199.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    i question the validity of your test and/or it's application in the current context. what I am hearing is "the average non-technical person incapable of using Google."
20. 200.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    "We don’t care, our payments are handled by a 3rd party payment provider" "Thanks for your suggestion, but our shop is totally safe. There is just an annoying javascript error." please share the stores sending these negl
21. 201.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    it's a moral machine, why invoke law?
22. 202.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    "overly verbose" might be giving too much credit... it's bad code
23. 203.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    the only thing we can extrapolate from this is that not every single person who goes to Spain gets robbed.
24. 204.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    but not all unsecured, either. :)
25. 205.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    what's going on in Syria is a function of too many of the wrong people taking life too seriously. your shitty attitude stems from the same function.
26. 206.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    > Basically, our conceptual understanding is lacking. But dualists or idealists might say the same thing, so ... my point exactly. :) i'm not sure whose eyes the author is trying to open.
27. 207.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    > Just because we can't figure out a physical picture of consciousness doesn't mean there isn't one. didn't Descartes try to explain this hundreds of years ago? > it is the physical part that is the big mystery,
28. 208.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    i'm struggling to identify the point of the article. mystery and matter have never been mutually exclusive. depending on it's configuration, matter can lead to some mysterious things. "it's matter" is a bad answer t
29. 209.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    > "The problem with school is that most of the consumers of said education are unmotivated slackers whom you practically have to beat the information into." I almost stopped reading after that bit and I kind of wish I did. ther
30. 210.▲
    by catshirt 10y ago

    "Good for playing around with and exploring the idea." my point, for the most part. :)