catshirt

81 ms·

781.
by catshirt 15y ago
quite different, since honesty and rudeness are so often conflated. racism or not is a bit more clear. not that it invalidates your point, but does provide a credible reason to preface something with "i don't mean to be..."
782.
by catshirt 15y ago
this is github pages. it is neither new nor unknown. move along please. first four paragraphs are a personal anecdote, and the last 2 are a regurgitation of the official github pages documentation, which the author links to.
783.
by catshirt 15y ago
i assume messenger works the same way, but the nature of hook is the processes are completely decoupled. essentially, you are just creating an event emitter that works cross-process. one benefit of this decoupling is it enables you to spin
784.
by catshirt 15y ago
similarly, check out hook-io by nodejitsu. i actually don't see the benefit of messenger.js at all in comparison. perhaps its simplicity, if that happens to be beneficial in your scenario.
785.
by catshirt 15y ago
this is disingenuous. there are other elements to immersive theatre than being included in the script. would you say the same about going to a play? that said, i've been to shows where they use the audience. it depends on the production. li
786.
by catshirt 15y ago
the spy example is fair, but i think what has most potential are the immersive theatre experiences. like other comments referenced, sleep no more and secret cinema. i really can't do sleep no more justice in a comment. "immersive", again, i
787.
by catshirt 15y ago
from where did you extrapolate his "decision not to see his work being duplicated elsewhere"? as far as i was able to tell he simply requested the profits were given to charity- of which there were none. moreso, and i recognize this is a to
788.
by catshirt 15y ago
no one, for all intents and purposes, would associate these signs with facebook.
789.
by catshirt 15y ago
i can't even see the problem here if they were selling them for $0 profit. let's assume for a second they sold them for $5 each and that is the actual cost of production. would ben show the same hostility to individuals who spent $5 to make
790.
by catshirt 15y ago
this is sad. zynga is sad. specifically, this habitual rip-offery. i won't call them shady , which i think is a popular opinion. not because i don't think they are, but just because i don't want to have to defend that position. i will howe
791.
by catshirt 15y ago
in all, as a fan of both php and small tools (the rarest of a rare breed), i agree with the author. but if i may play with the analogy... i'd actually say the Rush vs Black Flag analogy does not do Neil Peart or micro concepts justice. ide
792.
by catshirt 15y ago
for new programmers, the entry barrier for those languages is significantly greater than javascript. people don't quit learning programming because they're not learning OOP- they quit because it's inaccessible.
793.
by catshirt 15y ago
probably depends on your definition of "mind reading", but sounds like it warrants a longbet.
794.
by catshirt 15y ago
i can say with near complete certainty that if HBO or CC paid for the special he would receive substantially less than 100%
795.
by catshirt 15y ago
and a slimmer tool inspired by jsawk (in node) https://gist.github.com/1053262
796.
by catshirt 15y ago
what if you want to be listed in the app store?
797.
by catshirt 15y ago
how does this compare to Titanium? [1] i'd research myself, but there's not much to look at. [1] http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-desktop-applic...
798.
by catshirt 15y ago
i don't even know what you're arguing with to be honest- i merely suggested you and MostAwesomeDude have different definitions for class. which is exactly what your reply suggests. classes create new types . this is precisely why MostAweso
799.
by catshirt 15y ago
i am not discounting anything. i am simply suggesting i think it's fair (if not more accurate) to say javascript does not have classes.
800.
by catshirt 15y ago
perhaps you guys are arguing semantics. i think it's fair to say javascript does not have traditional inheritance or classes. crockford seems to agree [0], perhaps i don't understand the argument. [0] http://javascript.crockford.com/javasc
801.
by catshirt 15y ago
this is awesome. seriously. maybe you could package the technology in a way that lets other platforms use this without youtube. i am reminded of the original Color app.
802.
by catshirt 15y ago
i thought it was weird to use express right away for any node article. the obvious concern is that it's easy to conflate ideas when you're learning a library and a platform at the same time. following my expectation, this article is full of
803.
by catshirt 15y ago
http://documentcloud.github.com/backbone/
804.
by catshirt 15y ago
what about the number of foot pedals that aren't used for guitars..? this is a foot pedal. i'm only complaining because i was really interested in an arduino guitar foot pedal .
805.
by catshirt 15y ago
what about this foot pedal makes it a guitar foot pedal?
806.
by catshirt 15y ago
"I know this does NOT fully quallify as an operating system. This is really just a hobby project of mine and this is the name I chose." the thing about names, though, is they are used to signify what something is. at the very least, it shou
807.
by catshirt 15y ago
damnit, google. no nested selectors?
808.
by catshirt 15y ago
like i've said recently [1], jquery mobile is 90% complete. unfortunately, the last 10% accounts for nearly all the polish required to make a web app feel awesome. personally, i think that's important for 1.0. i'm sure jquery's focus is on
809.
by catshirt 15y ago
so because he's in 6th grade, it is inherently great? forgive us for analyzing human development.
810.
by catshirt 15y ago
first i'd like to say i am perhaps being over critical, i think it's a fantastic library (framework). i just realize how intensely better it could be. my biggest pet peeve is that it is indeed a framework, not a library. i really wish they

More ›