Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
catigula
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
601.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
The CEO of my company is the same person. Narcissism blinders on, "you can develop an entire application in minutes, we can fire our whole staff". Doesn't realize that if this was true he'd be fired as well. The entrepre
602.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
Sure, but you still have no idea what consciousness is.
603.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I don't think their experience of consciousness would be very analogous to what you and I understand.
604.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
Unfortunately you've undermined your point by making sweeping claims about something that is the literal hardest known problem in philosophy (consciousness). I'm not actually comfortable saying that LLMs aren't conscious. I t
605.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
What you're describing doesn't sound like something that requires a lot of foreign laborers.
606.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
Yep. ChatGPT was hugely irresponsible in many ways and rests solely on the shoulders of Sam Altman, someone allegedly implicated in various schemes.
607.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I'm not interested in partisan political discussions. I don't agree that Trump or anyone else can, or is even attempting to address core problems, and also think falling for that premise is silly.
608.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I think I probably disagree. Fundamentally the question to me becomes "what is the meaning of life" and I don't actually think the answer is even "to be extremely comfortable". This is my core disagreement with tech
609.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
No, not really. 1. The data going back 70 years, which is 50 years more than 20, show that suicide has sharply risen. 2. The integrity of data much older than that is substantially in question.
610.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
Putting aside my concerns about the integrity of the data, the clearly "correct" reference point is the one it takes to falsify the parent comment's claim: that this extremely brief period of gizmos, gadgets, economic plenty
611.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I respect your thoughts here because I think they come from a good place and that you want to help people. I just don't know how to express to you how philosophically naive I think the kind of utilitarian assertion you've made is.
612.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I'm not sure what point you think is being made but your own chart shows suicide exploding during the exact timeline we're discussing. It's probably not causative, as that would be quite silly, but economic plenty for extreme
613.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I think you trying to transmute this to polemic weakens the points you've attempted to make. Obviously we disagree but the point I feel most compelled to push back against is your assertion that "living in the modern US is paradis
614.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I'm just confused as to why the US population needed to grow by almost 100 million since I was born without any sort of infrastructure undertaking to sustain that massive immigration. My local community is terrifically swollen with peo
615.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I mean that seems like a tip to help fraudsters?
616.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
That is quite the allegation.
617.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
My perception is that the site is horrifically partisan and punishing for average users. The key is to not mistake your social circle with "normal".
618.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
That is interesting given that reddit has gone from a cultural powerhouse to something most people talk about shamefully, if at all.
619.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
Interesting because that post was comparing the cost directly to a developer salary.
620.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
Do any of these companies actually sell their products as developer replacements?
621.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I mean there's an article in Fortune magazine about the people pushing transformer "research" building doomsday bunkers. Making Google look like the mature person in the room is a tall order but it seems to have been filled.
622.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I mean, I feel like autism is a terrible example here, it's not just some quirky personality trait, it's a reality people live with that runs the gamut from difficult to completely debilitating. Even the more mild forms of autism
623.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
It's hard to stake out a defensible position on bold claims like these because, if they were as presented, it's hard to see how you haven't simply completed runaway AI. Philosophically, let's say you talk an old LLM thro
624.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I think my overall take on that is I don't actually have this strong desire to preserve people's freedom to be unsafe on public roads. Perhaps, if it were truly a personal decision, I'd be more charitable.
625.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
Yes, I only see downsides. It's mostly because the actual stated and actualized goal of real AI is clearly bad. It's like if you approached me and said "I'm going to erase meaning from your life. You will want for nothin
626.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
What's the "reward"? I want to interrogate AI optimist type people because even if AI is completely safe and harmless I literally see only downsides. Is your perception that living in theorized extreme comfort correlates to &
627.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I just want to outline my overarching concern off the bat with similar sentiments I see expressed exactly in this vein by people: there's a very strong potential for serious cognitive biases, and, frankly, simple flawed logic, to be op
628.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
I understand, but that's partially caused by compliance software being problematic. Now with tightening federal regulations and lawsuits for faulty ADAS manufacturers are tightening the belt. Investment must be substantial for the 2029
629.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
Car software is so thankless and opaque. Look at the market landscape: literally nobody knows that Toyota produces the #1 system for automated driver safety aids (ADAS) and it isn't close - their current generation of vision/radar
630.
▲
by
catigula
1y ago
People definitely have disposable income. They can, and are willing, to go into even non-trivial amounts of debt if you're good enough. The goal is extracting your portion of it via social engineering and other mechanisms available to
More ›