catigula

15 ms·

391.
by catigula 1y ago
If only laws and having to respect people and privacy didn't exist, then we could build our machine God and I could maybe (but probably not) live forever!
392.
by catigula 1y ago
>I see lots of people worried that the aim of all of this is to ultimately have a robot do their entire job Correct, this is the aim and tons of capital is being deployed to this end. Worse, it looks inevitable, not just plausible, if yo
393.
by catigula 1y ago
This is not how statistical analysis works. You need to know how the comparison was done to know if it's valid. You can't merely tell me the data points you've used as evidence of the success of your methods. With claims like
394.
by catigula 1y ago
>measurable but modest productivity improvements No mention of how this was measured.
395.
by catigula 1y ago
Who's That Pariah State
396.
by catigula 1y ago
You could assign me a task from your job and I could trivially complete it using agents. However, I will charge consulting rates.
397.
by catigula 1y ago
Again you're taking your own circumstance or even patent inability and extending that to the entire technology. You've set yourself up such that all I need to do is go "I'm developing complex veterinary software includin
398.
by catigula 1y ago
Say, isn't there a country with a bone to pick with the UN that is considered """friendly"""?
399.
by catigula 1y ago
Okay well I and many other experienced engineers disagree so the only remaining conclusion is that you're misusing the technology.
400.
by catigula 1y ago
I don't expect him to tell you where he lives but my bill EXPLODED recently due to what I now know is data center demand.
401.
by catigula 1y ago
ok
402.
by catigula 1y ago
Tell me you haven't extensively used Claude Code or Codex GPT-5 without telling me.
403.
by catigula 1y ago
No thanks, I'll just take subsidies to my bill.
404.
by catigula 1y ago
Can we get some laws to force these companies to start subsidizing the consumer grids they're pummeling? The electric bills are getting out of hand.
405.
by catigula 1y ago
Consumer electric grids.
406.
by catigula 1y ago
The technology isn't there yet. All signs point to it rapidly progressing towards this inflection. Current agents are insanely good, every decent programmer using them knows this.
407.
by catigula 1y ago
"We can remove your programmers valued at millions per month for $100/month secure cloud agents" Pretty easy sell.
408.
by catigula 1y ago
There are all manner of things you can and cannot do with 'data'. For example, you cannot purchase a Blu-Ray, rip its contents and post them on the internet. This shouldn't be that "interesting".
409.
by catigula 1y ago
>in the future >programmers Don't Look Up
410.
by catigula 1y ago
I don't really know how to answer that, it's a highly fragmented legacy codebase that is responsible for many millions in revenue. I do know that given my experiences though it's time to sound the alarms as many others have.
411.
by catigula 1y ago
Nope. I regularly do 80-100 chunks in a mature codebase. Literally every day at work. I know it feels good to pretend this isn't happening but it's too dangerous to pretend.
412.
by catigula 1y ago
The problem is you're thinking of projects in the sense of 0-100. If you think of projects in the sense of 0-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-80, 80-100 you realize AI is here to stay and is going to change everything.
413.
by catigula 1y ago
Merely saying something does not make it so. I feel like you're too far off what I would consider a thread of conversation to continue this, I wish you well though.
414.
by catigula 1y ago
How is it tautological? Some form of it is the very basis of atheism. Doomsday timelines have lower numbers of observers. In all timelines where you are no longer an observer,i.e. all current doomsday timelines, your observation has ceased.
415.
by catigula 1y ago
There's a certain anthropic quality to the idea that if we lived in a doomsday timeline we'd be unlikely to be here observing it.
416.
by catigula 1y ago
If AI researchers are wrong they're gonna have a lot of explaining to do.
417.
by catigula 1y ago
You're saying the words but I suspect you haven't interrogated them. Again, I'm not sharing my speculation, I'm sharing my actual experience and conclusions as an atheist. Anyways, it doesn't seem like we're ge
418.
by catigula 1y ago
1. You've made the mistake of assuming I'm religious. I am not. This is my lived experience. 2. I think that, largely, materialism is a system that isn't merely arrogant (which it clearly is, as outlined above), but also unfu
419.
by catigula 1y ago
It's is immensely epistemically arrogant to so confidently opine on this topic when every single day you experience consciousness, which is impossible to explain at all using Physics and likely simply impossible to ever explain within
420.
by catigula 1y ago
>There’s no modern cultural framework for dealing with death Correct, secularism can't deal with death, it doesn't work.

More ›