Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
catach
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
> There are no non cloud options if MS Office anymore That's thankfully not true. For example: https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/microsoft-365/p/office-profe...
122.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Is there any reason why doing that with Mastodon is worse?
123.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
I only use my phone for work slack, messaging friends/family, and reading ebooks.
124.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
> I'm purely talking about the ability of someone to sign their own emails without being dependent on a monopoly like Gmail to do it for them. What is blockchain adding for this usecase that's beyond what PGP [1] offers? [1] h
125.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
People being annoyed enough to leave twitter is not synonymous with them also joining Mastodon.
126.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
I am curious, what are your biggest pain points?
127.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
I find this is a good explainer: https://wiki.tcl-lang.org/page/everything+is+a+string
128.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
"Years away" is shockingly closer than most of us would have assumed just a year ago, I think.
129.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
I don't think a personal webpage falls under any of those categories.
130.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Quite a lot, seems like: https://www.statista.com/statistics/187549/facebook-distribu...
131.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
At least a bad faith signal makes it easy to bail from the discussion. Seemingly-honest, good faith confusion is somehow worse due to the obligation to clarify.
132.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Very much so. Write first for yourself. Write to your own standard of quality. A borrowed standard is one never fully understood, nor knowingly achieved.
133.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
> being super defensive to avoid the most uncharitable possible reading. Had my eyes opened recently by just how wild people can get with their inferences. Defense is impossible when you're asserting X, but also have to explicitly
134.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
"Sound" as in "stable" might be a bit that helps.
135.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
> claiming that AI is generating something completely new is a bit naive IMHO. I don't see how AI art is less new than the vast majority of human art. Both can create unique compositions that are still deeply rooted in patterns an
136.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Absolutely. Though I think that speaks to one of the ways we tend to discount the difficulty of developing human artistry, rather than a defense of AI gen being "not hard".
137.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
It seems to me that the human effort spent in creating the original images in an AI's data set is an important element to consider when thinking of the "difficulty" here.
138.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
I believe it makes up for that quite usefully by having a similar depth/height limit as width.
139.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
> They would not use that naming if they intended to support the official ARM ISA in the long run. Given Apple's marketing priorities, my guess is that the intent you speak of had zero weight in their naming decisions either way. Th
140.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
I was hoping for an argument outlining what seemed to be the thesis "Crypto has no future for a simple and irrefutable reason; it is based on logically incoherent ideas and serves no legal purpose." But instead the article takes t
141.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Isn't this a better link for Firefox, since it covers their reasoning and where they're not following Chrome? https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2022/05/18/manifest-v3-in-fi...
142.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Gotta start somewhere.
143.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
I'm looking at this from an economics study view, not a public policy view. Definitions have an inherently arbitrary component, sure. But stable, precise definitions are far easier to reason with than a shifting definition like "w
144.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Increased precision in base concepts makes it easier to measure and reason about the real-world drift from those bases.
145.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
That's certainly a model one could use, but it strikes me as not particularly useful.
146.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Consider: Option 1: the definition of "capitalism" requires that zero regulation be applied. In that case, abandon "capitalism" and replace it with whatever you'd call the same model but with regulation. Option 2: a
147.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
If "capitalism" can't survive reasonable consumer protection then perhaps it deserves to die, sure.
148.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Out of curiosity: if Rust isn't boring for you currently, what would it take for Rust to become boring?
149.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Seems like this particular branch is talking about the suitability of using woodworking for the analogy.
150.
▲
by
catach
4y ago
Sometimes an agenda is as simple as "I really like this thing, and I think you'd like it too". I believe this is off-putting primarily due to the mental antibodies people must develop in an advertising-saturated culture. The
More ›