> claiming that AI is generating something completely new is a bit naive IMHO. I don't see how AI art is less new than the vast majority of human art. Both can

> claiming that AI is generating something completely new is a bit naive IMHO. I don't see how AI art is less new than the vast majority of human art. Both can create unique compositions that are still deeply rooted in patterns and principles thousands of years old. > Humans mix a much more broader and deeper experience pool to create things without prompts. AI does not have understanding, but it's stealing the underlying patterns that are the end result of that human experience.