casraso

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by casraso 6y ago

   This is why I am puzzled when people say 'you should fight your battles in the courts, not through protests'. It has always been about who can afford better lawyers, who can win the war of attrition, and a whole lot of luck along
2. 2.▲
   by casraso 6y ago

   What does any of that have to do with surveillance?
3. 3.▲
   by casraso 6y ago

   I disagree with your premise entirely. I'm not sure a single 'check and balance' exists that can keep surveillance under control. It has an inherent propensity for abuse. There is no amount of bureaucracy or red tape that wil
4. 4.▲
   by casraso 6y ago

   What is a specific example of such a process, check, and/or balance that the united states has that china does not?
5. 5.▲
   by casraso 6y ago

   Americans like to think they are immune to propaganda, or that for some reason other countries produce more of it than they do. What I have observed as someone not living in china or america is that they are roughly on equal footing and pro