Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cas14655
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
You took your time thinking about your excuses. The fact is that you weren't the slightest bit aware of the magnitude or direction of NHS funding. You just assumed it must be down because that's the only reason the godlike public
2.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
By March 2020 we had the Diamond Princess Data which established an upper bound of 1% case fatality rate (CFR) for COVID. We already knew then that it's definitely not the Spanish Flu (2.5 - 10% CFR), not Cholera (3%), not Smallpox (3%
3.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Please describe the strawman.
4.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Well, you are right in a way. Contact tracing, masks and social distancing make even less sense for corona viruses which we full well knew in 2020.
5.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
> If you have to search out a single country out of over a hundred to find supporting data you probably are just p-hacking You are not considering how positivism works. If you say lockdowns work you have to prove that in all instances. I
6.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
In itself your statement is accurate: we did not have data that is impossible to have. In broader context the implication is not correct. We had experts consider long and hard what to do in the case of an influenza pandemic and the consensu
7.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Sweden Age Adjusted Mortality 3rd January 2020 through 18th June 2021: -2.3% Source: ONS Not only did lockdowns fail, they were unnecessary and cruel and tyrannical. I sincerely hope that the responsible people will face justice that is jus
8.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Liberals: "We will fix X with policy Y" Conservatives (-2, flagged): "All you'll do is cause Z" Reality: X is now worse and Y had unintended consequence Z Liberals: "Z isn't happening and anyone who says o
9.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
> pro-spending / pro-austerity NHS spending 2009/2010: £124.1 billion NHS spending 2019/2020: £148.9 billion > What exactly is the point you are trying to make? You don't have a clue about what's actually goin
10.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Are you getting at potentially unknown long term effects of COVID infection?
11.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
People keep saying this so there is probably something to it. I mean, not even the most optimistic mask studies show a long-term complete protection from all pathogens that can cause colds but okay, let's take it at face value: your wi
12.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
If conversations about COVID seem impossible it might be because a substantial portions of the population overestimates the danger from COVID by as much as 50x. Source: https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/354938
13.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
> This, does. Because it has nothing to do with the submission but all with covid minmizing thrown in after a legitimate question. Question: how low does the IFR have to be so we can call a disease "not so bad" without "mi
14.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
My girlfriend sells self-made clothes online. In 2015 I made her a a small Tapestry 5 webapp to manage her orders and, this was the crucial feature, to determine payment status from her copy'n'paste online banking's transacti
15.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
I am talking about this table: https://www.ons.gov.uk/download/table?format=xlsx&uri=/peopl... (warning excel) It shows that of the 32 European countries 17 didn't even exceed an excess of 5% in the whol
16.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
These are two examples of how measures specifically meant to fight the disease caused a lot of deaths. Care homes also had deaths from loneliness and despair due to banning family visits, another pandemic measure that is still going on toda
17.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
> I agree that communication was awful all over the board I appreciate the peace offering but you have to understand that, for me, this topic is deeply personal. I am not willing to let it go on "oh let's call it awful and move
18.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Well except that a lot of countries didn't have any unusual excess mortality in 2020. And anyway how do you separate the deaths caused by the measures from the deaths caused by COVID? Such as Discharging hospital patients into care hom
19.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
I am not doing that at all. Switzerland for example has similar vax rates to Germany and I'd bet that Flordia is similar to Cali. You can even compare before any vaccinations and it's the same picture. The reasons given for lockdo
20.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
You really think you are in the right here? Wow!
21.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
A: "Ten professional singers performed a passage of the Ludwig van Beethoven’s “Ode of Joy” in two experimental setups—each with and without surgical masks. First, they sang with previously inhaled vapor of e-cigarettes. The emitted cl
22.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Depends on what you mean by efficacy. It's recently taken on the meaning of "Protection against death and hospitalization" which is not necessarily related to infections. But yeah, UK data going back into last fall consistent
23.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
yes, spike protein is the culprit I think. When the vaccine came out it was believed that the spike is harmless but later it was shown that the spike protein is enough to cause symptoms similar to the disease COVID. [1] For a long time peop
24.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
There is literally no reason or evidence that think that the restrictions had any effect at all let alone a significant one worth the trade offs. If for some reason you are allergic to Sweden you can compare England Winter 2022 with Germany
25.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Hundreds of thousands died with a positive PCR test, yes. But then everyone who died had one taken. Certainly, a number of those died because because of this particular infection but the average COVID death was a very old person who had two
26.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Masks seem silly no matter what if you understand how corona spreads or if you know how after 2 years, in diagrams, you can't see a difference between unmasked/cloth masked/ffp2,N95 masked countries or even counties.
27.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
slowly we are progressing from "it can't be the vaccine". I can already see this is going to be a long couple of decades.
28.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
The vax doesn't prevent infection.
29.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
Except for two things: a) that corona spreads through aerosols which we have known since mid 2020 b) Mask don't even work against Influenza which actually is transmitted via droplets.
30.
▲
by
cas14655
4y ago
TFA specifically answers this question. > [..] increased CA incidence was not observed among the 16–39 age group in 2020
More ›