carlisle_

9 ms·

31.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
> There are two parties and you have to pick one. Well that’s certainly a dishonest premise.
32.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
I don’t follow the logic. Saying something is whataboutism isn’t recursive.
33.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
This is called “whataboutism”.
34.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
What kind of virtue signaling is congratulating a startup for their innovation before they've proven anything? Also the word is "empathy" not "emphatic".
35.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
I find it strange that you keep talking past the point people are making. The problem is opt-out, and nobody is holding this company to a different standard. People hate opt-out, and in this case it looks particularly predatory. Your comm
36.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
My question is how can platforms ensure only “good” science is done at the scale they operate at? So many pseudosciences hide behind jargon, how much scientific education is required to delineate between the two at the velocity people want?
37.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
>Know when to break the rules. For rules like "don't repeat yourself," sometimes a little repetition is better than a bit of dependency. Glad to see DRY called out here. I've seen so much crazy code simply to avoid br
38.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
You're the first person to mention 'sexism' in this comment chain. Why is an investigation predicated on sexism? Why is sexual harassment not sufficient to warrant an investigation?
39.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
>Although questionable as a psychometric test That's an understatement. It's meritless pseudoscience.
40.
by carlisle_ 5y ago
I really like this post because it exudes nuance. So many problems are boiled down to terse summaries that are barely accurate when examining details. People being hateful and violent are a problem. More of a problem are the conditions that
41.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
>I feel like Google is far too cavalier about deprecating services and forcing their customers to do migration work. Having worked with quite a few ex-Googlers this is a pretty standard Google engineering pattern.
42.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
From the study: >We develop a robust econometric model of weather effects on global agricultural I don't think the US counts as global agriculture. Certainly a subset though.
43.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
>That doesn't look like someone just tooling around to me, that looks like someone recreating a build process. This is quite the leap in logic.
44.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
Did these guys really think people would buy it when their excuse is a literal cliché? What’s next? Did a dog eat their homework?
45.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
Because duplicity is an ethical norm for the entire Legal sector.
46.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
It's the definition of the word '[in]valid' I was referring to. I'd also say this is the same thing as when I said his anecdotes were not true. What I saw was somebody using biased and bigoted thought to justify their re
47.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
Nobody is going to care about how semantically correct you are given one of his anecdotes was him admitting he treats women differently because of their gender. Feel free to call that valid to appease your dictionary definition, however col
48.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
You want to argue that the guy espousing sexism through his anecdotal experiences has valid anecdotes?
49.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
I mean, you gonna stick up for the guy that just got banned?
50.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
You wanna get educated go educate yourself. I'm frankly pretty disgusted by your posts and don't have the patience to educate somebody who is stubborn and unwilling to consider other perspectives.
51.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
Why didn't you reply with this instead of answering my question with a question?
52.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
Dude you have two flagged posts talking about women and you're going to try to convince me you're a feminist?
53.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
You want me to speak for somebody else instead of you speaking for yourself?
54.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
What'd you really hope to accomplish with this post?
55.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
Htf do you call yourself a feminist with posts like this?
56.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
>You can't find someone else's anecdotes untrue. Sure I can when they're filled with obvious and apparent cognitive biases.
57.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
I'm saying what's the point of even keeping score when the odds are so stacked against women. Your complaints are entirely anecdotal, meanwhile it's very easy to point at empirical data showing how women are treated poorly. I
58.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
Oh no, women have one advantage over men (if it were true) in a male dominated field. How do you not see how contradictory that statement is?
59.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
>Why can't we focus on the rights of both genders? Ask yourself that question. In response to somebody writing about their experience changing careers you brought up how men aren't treated fairly.
60.
by carlisle_ 6y ago
Yes you did, did you expect me to be ashamed about this?

More ›