camus

39 ms·

361.
by camus 13y ago
that's called marketing , is it evil ?well... we all use it to sell whatever we need to sell.
362.
by camus 13y ago
i found Baas really hard to test , especially when you need to upload some bits of business logic somewhere ... I tried a bit with couchdb and couchapp, but i never figured out how to unit tests attached documents. Parse works a bit the sam
363.
by camus 13y ago
i've always been front-end first. creating the html/js first then the server api out of it , then finally chosing the persistance layer. So nothing new here. that's called building up to bottom . You focus on a few user scenarios and you ju
364.
by camus 13y ago
Can you share with us the tuning you did with class loading for instance ? thanks for your comment.
365.
by camus 13y ago
You'll be better off writing raw PHP without classes than using Go. Go performances are raw Go. As soon as you add any framework to the party , the perfs are falling. see the gorilla test which is a Go framework.
366.
by camus 13y ago
IMHO, . it is stated in the benchmark when a framework test uses an ORM or "raw" pdo/whatever for db request. Things like Doctrine are elegant and smart ,but let's face it,they are so slow. PHP is not JAVA. Hibernate may be fast on JAVA but
367.
by camus 13y ago
People chose language X over language Y not for performance reasons. Cost , ease of use and deployment , librairies , available programmers ,etc ... Things are more complicated than just a benchmarks. Furthermore NodeJS and raw PHP are doin
368.
by camus 13y ago
LuaJIT
369.
by camus 13y ago
you made my day lol ...
370.
by camus 13y ago
My gosh , i still have the hardwired amiga demo on disks ! it was amazing back then ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CGOh-jb4QM EDIT : is some demo code source available somewhere ? i knew a site back then , but it went offline.
371.
by camus 13y ago
me too , with a message telling me i have to download and install something to access the content , how is it web based ?
372.
by camus 13y ago
I think that what the main argument is, when one gets a Windowd laptop ,one can get something really powerfull and cheap. Macs are not that powerfull and not cheap at all. I bought my Mac a few years ago, I could have bought a x2 more power
373.
by camus 13y ago
then make people reset their password , force them if necessary.
374.
by camus 13y ago
if they are like us but more advanced, that's better. remember what happened to american indians? ;)
375.
by camus 13y ago
flat design is a fad and will go away , like all trends. It's not bad , but since it is used everywhere even where it should not be used , it is an abused trend.
376.
by camus 13y ago
> However, more SaaS applications should also consider a usage limited trial. it depends on the product , but for Saas that makes more sense. Even if the offer is really limited. However , what i dont like is services that has
377.
by camus 13y ago
looks great !
378.
by camus 13y ago
Javascript is a scripting language like python , ruby or php. It just lack of some spec for modules for instance , Node has its own module system.
379.
by camus 13y ago
"So i'm still an apache httpd guy , can you sell me nginx in 3 simple points ?" (actually i'm using it already , i need to sell it to my boss).
380.
by camus 13y ago
I've been using fireworks for 10 years. That's an amazing peace of software indeed.
381.
by camus 13y ago
strictly typed languages like java are harder to write , but easier to work with (and document ) since one can know what is what , and what a method expects. It's easy to write a hash in JS but harder to understand what parameters are expec
382.
by camus 13y ago
I dont know why, they are just stupid.
383.
by camus 13y ago
AS3 is awesome and is what javascript should have been. The flash IDE is great for vector graphics , animation ,and game assets. AIR is great , but there is a lot of untaped potential , and Adobe doesnt seem to be interested in making that
384.
by camus 13y ago
You can bash my grammar all you want , a proprietary plugin is always buggy and a security hole.
385.
by camus 13y ago
Because Adobe dont understand the web,it's not in their culture. They never invented one successfull webdeveloper product, and those they bought from Macromedia ( Dreamweaver , Fireworks , ColdFusion , Flash)...havent evolved a bit or are d
386.
by camus 13y ago
Hello , there is something called flashblock and click to play. And nothing guarantees that the Unity web player is not a turd , from security to performance and power conservation. Obviously you never used their player ...
387.
by camus 13y ago
except Unity works with its own web player that is very far from being bug free and secure.
388.
by camus 13y ago
So you are saying using a plugin is better than another one ? Doesnt make sense. How many users have the unity player deployed ? zip. And a plugin is still a plugin , wether it is flash or not.
389.
by camus 13y ago
because a drm plugin is a plugin,like flash or java applet. You'll have to download plugin DRM A,B or C to make it work.The only difference is that it will use the video tag.
390.
by camus 13y ago
So why do you suggest ? dropping any offline/online sync feature because the implications (for crud apps)? i guess you could have a system checking what resource has been updated since last connection and explicitly alerting the user the co

More ›