camus2

22 ms·

151.
by camus2 9y ago
> Or just pay the person who worked hard on the project and not be a selfish prick. and got granted $50.000 to maintain an open source project. Maybe that person who "worked hard" should give back the money, instead of being a
152.
by camus2 9y ago
> So yeah, if you're entertaining enough, people will throw money at you. Which was a well known fact since the beginning of strip clubs... Twitch and co are no different from sexcams.
153.
by camus2 9y ago
> The company that goes and builds this themselves instead of paying a small fee for it, would be a pretty stupid company haha... There is a fork without the adware now, so the smart company will use the fork to get rid of the stupid ads
154.
by camus2 9y ago
> Off the top of my head, Google requires you to own any new third-party dependencies you pull into the source tree. Therefore, Google engineers think very carefully about their dependencies. And I doubt the same Google would just downlo
155.
by camus2 9y ago
It has a few bells and whistle and there is some work behind it, no question. HOWEVER, the fact that it relies entirely on go std lib net/http|http2 package implementations personally doesn't make it very useful if your developing
156.
by camus2 9y ago
> Big companies are where they're going to buy the licenses because in those companies time is often more kmportnant than budget so you just buy stuff. It doesn't work quite like that. Unless you're friend with the guy who
157.
by camus2 9y ago
No reason to generate that page using Javascript, it's just a blog post. It took 10 seconds to load on my computer by the way, when loading should be almost immediate considering the little amount of text on that page. If you are going
158.
by camus2 9y ago
This is the correct answer.
159.
by camus2 9y ago
> It's been fairly apparent to me that science doesn't really counter religious belief. Show me how one multiplies fishes. There are 2 differents questions when it comes to religion. One is philosophical : "Does a moral go
160.
by camus2 9y ago
Back in the days I thought that what made the Huffington Post popular, politics aside, was its gamified commenting system which I though was excellent. Since then of course, it degraded UX wise until it was replaced by Facebook comments(hor
161.
by camus2 9y ago
> Can someone explain what Java EE really means? I tried to parse the bundle and license the last time this came up, and I didn't really get anywhere. It's no different than Web standards between browsers, it's a collectio
162.
by camus2 9y ago
> I think angular just makes more sense in larger projects. I remember people saying exactly that with Extjs back in the days, with no proof whatsoever. Can you explain how angular makes more sense in larger projects? > that only pays
163.
by camus2 9y ago
> It's funny how, for years, we've been trying to get away from HTML mixed with code (specially in spaguetti PHP), just to get back to something similar again. The difference is that PHP+HTML is basically just templating. The H
164.
by camus2 9y ago
Running Linux/debian/freebsd on Windows/Mac, Simulating actual networks on a single computer ... You can then run Docker inside a Vagrant VM.
165.
by camus2 9y ago
https://godoc.org/github.com/rubenv/sql-migrate
166.
by camus2 9y ago
So if I get things right : - ASM.js : basically assembly with a subset of javascript syntax - WebAssembly : assembly with a different format which doesn't require parsing javascript. - languages built on top of WebAssembly : C/C++
167.
by camus2 9y ago
> C is frequently praised (including in some of the posts here) for its suitability for real-time and embedded systems development, but the author appears to be proposing modifying the C runtime and code generation in ways that, when don
168.
by camus2 9y ago
> For better or worse (personally, I think, for the better), they're starting with JavaScript, Python, Ruby, or even PHP. These higher level languages are still built with C(Python,PHP) or C++(V8 Javascript engine) though, so C is s
169.
by camus2 9y ago
PHP and C have getopt in their standard library which work mostly the same way. flag package bothers me because it breaks getopt conventions for no good reason.
170.
by camus2 9y ago
> https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/process.html#process_proc... . This is not argument parsing. I'm pretty sure Node doesn't even do anything, it just gets an array of strings from the CLI, argv
171.
by camus2 9y ago
> I routinely use vanilla PHP (no special libraries) for CLI scripts Vanilla PHP has better argument parsing than many recent hipster language. Go has some sort of ugly non conventional argument library which is barely usable, Node has n
172.
by camus2 9y ago
> But, the thing that struck me about this project and the examples is just how verbose PHP has gotten over the years. It is strikingly similar to old Java, in terms of class definitions and the like. It's all opt-in. Nothing forces
173.
by camus2 9y ago
> GObject has a much richer object model than what C++ provides out of the box. They could have used C++ and added the other semantics, but then you would end up with something similar to QObject in Qt and people would complain about tha
174.
by camus2 9y ago
No. Oracle is mainly B2B, and executives love Oracle solutions.
175.
by camus2 9y ago
> C is a vastly simpler language with good and well-tried semantics.The simpler language spec may make sense to do OO with suboptimal tools vs C++. But GObject isn't a simple type system on top of C, A C compiler wont catch any GObj
176.
by camus2 9y ago
Obj-C is nice, but it's not like they couldn't use C++. So why not just C++? why this obsession with C even when it makes no sense?
177.
by camus2 9y ago
s/upgrade/rewrite . I don't believe a second there is a reasonable way to upgrade 1.X from 4.X without rewriting all UI related code.
178.
by camus2 9y ago
> If you rely on a beta product you should have no expectation of API stability. If i rely on a beta product, i don't expect a complete rewrite of the API when a stable version is released. That's exactly what happened, several
179.
by camus2 9y ago
> "We invested in a beta product and then shock horror - it changes before it's released. Let's blame the framework on that poor choice." Angular.2 has been in beta for years. And when it went out of beta it basically
180.
by camus2 9y ago
> Angular2 is cake imo. Angular.X totally lacks of vision. For years it didn't know what it wanted to be, pilling up layers of layers of complexity with IoC containers (useless in a weakly and dynamically typed language such as java

More ›