campezzi

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by campezzi 8y ago

   Some languages deal with this better than others through structural sharing, which reduces overhead significantly. The performance hit is usually unnoticeable in those languages and only becomes a problem in very specific cases ie. processi
2. 2.▲
   by campezzi 8y ago

   Immutability. I didn't really understand the benefits of having immutable data structures until I tried building a service with no mutations whatsoever... and noticed I didn't get any weird, head-scratching bugs that took hours to
3. 3.▲
   Show HN: 15-Puzzle in Elm(github.com)

   3 points by campezzi 9y ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   by campezzi 10y ago

   I would normally agree, but Apple has a good track record of yanking out things that were considered crucial and turned out to be relics from the past in desperate need of innovation (or replacement). My optimistic prediction: the increased
5. 5.▲
   by campezzi 12y ago

   Do you recommend any framework for Haskell web development? I really liked toying around with the language, but I hit a brick wall when trying to build something "real" with it - it's hard to find decent guides that made the
6. 6.▲
   by campezzi 13y ago

   Great news, good work guys. I've been following Padrino for a few months now and it's by far my favourite Ruby framework - I find it to provide a very elegant and powerful layer of functionality on top of Sinatra. I really hope it