caminante

9 ms·

121.
by caminante 6mo ago
Ran it through Claude, Grok, whatever...for me, they all flagged issues (no sources, punchy phrases with repetition,...) with these content farms. My favorite: couldn't even prove the author is a real person. They all found no record!
122.
by caminante 6mo ago
Doesn't seem right as plenty of institutionals get cooked. He claims loyalty with long-term holders who trust him (read:less nagging and more license). I suspect it's also more convenient for his IR team to avoid worthless meeting
123.
by caminante 6mo ago
Check out this article from today [0]. It sounds like it's more of a profit maximization function (and not just demand) with GPU rental prices increasing 48% since Feb. > Renting one of Nvidia’s most-advanced Blackwell generation o
124.
by caminante 6mo ago
Great callout. Author probably ran out of time on a broader piece. There is a quote about limited DC buildout due to power constraints, but that's a "future" problem v. what the article appears to describe as a "now&quot
125.
by caminante 6mo ago
> you'll have to put up with rumors. > But the numbers are available for companies like DeepSeek You'd rather trust self-reported figures? LMAO
126.
by caminante 6mo ago
AFAIK, 1. the 80% margin from 2025 was theoretical, 2. they're relying on distillation/synthetic data for training, 3. and have been very opaque about cross-subsidization of R&D with their models. The distillation alone adds a
127.
by caminante 6mo ago
Great point. The parent's argument is that the marginal cost of inference is minimal. However, the fundamental flaw is that he's separating inference from the high cost frontier models. It's a cross-subsidy that can't be
128.
by caminante 6mo ago
>OpenAI's compute margin, referring to the share of revenue excluding the costs of running its AI models for paying users Huh? The reddit summary comment makes no sense. How are they getting revenues without ads or paying customer
129.
by caminante 6mo ago
Not a new trend. Mini-article is from 2007. At the time, more reports were generated than humans could read. People weren't reading them for good reason. I suspect author is more annoyed about people being (grossly) negligent in readin
130.
by caminante 6mo ago
I challenge you to find a third party, credible news source that calls Hezbollah "moderate" as you framed them. Until then, you really can't defend your fundamental claims. I suspect you're intentionally avoiding uncomf
131.
by caminante 6mo ago
You're not being objective or historically accurate in your take. Don't believe me? I encourage you to put this in an LLM and ask if you're being fair. E.g., calling an Iran backed Shia militant group "moderate" com
132.
by caminante 6mo ago
> we were alive in the 20th century... "we"? Your point's either literal (false) or figurative (arbitrary). Why would you say something so misleading? You'd be 100 years old for the pre-Israel British-colonial perio
133.
by caminante 6mo ago
Your argument isn't principled because starting in the 20th century is arbitrary. Why not go back in time to the 15-1600s when the Ottoman Empire went "colonial" on Jews? We don't have a time machine. In the present, Isr
134.
by caminante 6mo ago
Per the guide, it's not zero sum. > Scores are independent — they don't need to add up to 100%.
135.
by caminante 6mo ago
>impossible neighbor The entire neighborhood sucks. Doesn't this also apply to Hezbollah in Lebanon? > "[Hezbollah's] struggle will end only when this entity [Israel] is obliterated" [0] [0] https://en
136.
by caminante 6mo ago
I get your point. I don't think it's effective here. What do you have to say to Hezbollah confirming 400 combatant losses? The Lebanese health ministry also confirmed 1500, of which only 300 were women, children, and health worker
137.
by caminante 7mo ago
Did you not read it before sharing? What is your point?
138.
by caminante 7mo ago
Really? This is from your wiki you linked. > On 2 March 2026, the ceasefire effectively broke down amid the nascent 2026 Iran war,
139.
by caminante 7mo ago
Israel won't get sainthood anytime soon, but Hezbollah is Iran-backed, based in Lebanon, and breaking ceasefires with Israel without direct provocation. Israel has killed over a thousand Hezbollah militants since March 2. What would yo
140.
by caminante 7mo ago
It's more complex than your comment. Per your article, Israel stopped bombing Lebanon in a November 2024 ceasefire. However, Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon broke that prior ceasefire on March 2 in retaliation for the death of the Aya
141.
by caminante 7mo ago
and some (most?) countries offered support...? Spain has held a firm line, but even others such as UK/FR have allowed use of facilities or engaged their air craft carriers or facilitated US movements.
142.
by caminante 7mo ago
Even worse, the other child comments are speculating (and didn't RTFA either) when the answer is clear in the article. > We found this defect by distilling a behavioural specification of the IMU subsystem using Allium, an AI-native
143.
by caminante 7mo ago
How did you pick out AI native and miss the rest of the SAME sentence? > We found this defect by distilling a behavioural specification of the IMU subsystem using Allium, an AI-native behavioural specification language.
144.
by caminante 7mo ago
IMHO, he was defensive in the way you suggest. He got ~25% upfront. But let's assume he got 100% upfront. More importantly, he didn't protect scope or contract change requests. That was the time to contract. It sounds like collect
145.
by caminante 7mo ago
You haven't confirmed WHY they have a flip phone. If you're using a flip phone in this day and age, then it's not about the money.
146.
by caminante 7mo ago
You mean "METI"? METI is your key driver? You're really overselling their capabilities. See the "lost decades" or most recently, the hundreds of billions deployed for the failed hydrogen initiatives.
147.
by caminante 7mo ago
Ironic given author brazenly brags about being a top AI assisted author, "writing" 100 articles per month [0] and this article is paywalled. If you're going to AI, why paywall? [0] https://www.wsj.com/business&
148.
by caminante 7mo ago
I was aware of the IRGC graft. I tried to check the amounts normalized for % of GDP. Conservative estimates put them at half of the 2% GDP military spend. However, the IRGC's tentacles are also estimated to siphon off something like +5
149.
by caminante 7mo ago
I agree that it could come off as gross negligence to not care about what happens with your data. My point is that LinkedIn already has enough information (We've willingly given them!) to manipulate outcomes and if they're doing s
150.
by caminante 7mo ago
You're glossing over the nuance of the Cambridge Analytica scandal or at least I don't see how it's connected here. Facebook was a party, but not the protagonist. - a Cambridge researcher (Aleks Kogan) created a personality q

More ›