calrissian

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by calrissian 3y ago

   Aren't you mistaking the state and ability of being consistent, with the incentives for consistency? All these systems of governance would ultimately be useless without the ability to conform to them. And conform we do. Maybe the ambig
2. 2.▲
   by calrissian 3y ago

   I don't think you're necessarily wrong in your assesment about HN and AI enthusiasts, but also in this case I think it's more accurate to talk about a Twitter agitator and race-baiter [1], rather than a "researcher of et
3. 3.▲
   by calrissian 3y ago

   > Also not surprised at the immediate down votes for questioning Googles new AI lead! That's because you are wrong to pretend he did anything wrong by firing T.G. And also, because you added this weird lie/mudslinging/what
4. 4.▲
   by calrissian 4y ago

   It seems to me that the article combines syllogisms with sensationalism and displays a significant lack of understanding of technology. A logical examination of these factors could form the basis of an AI-generated piece: "Journalism s
5. 5.▲
   by calrissian 6y ago

   I loved this article for the many cognitive dissonances it brings into light. Some of them are internalized by the author, and for some other he has to carefully maneuver around them. First, I would like to point out that it is evident, obv