Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
calderknight
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
31.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Do you live in a densely populated area? There are free ones where I live too but I guess it might be different in the middle of a large city.
32.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
or just use Worldcoin
33.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
So he said in 2021 that >FSD will be capable of Level 5 autonomy by the end of 2021 Even though they hadn't achieved level 3 or 4? And still haven't two years later?
34.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
This doesn't mean very much to me without an explanation of what the actual progress has been. For example, has level 4 autonomy been achieved?
35.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Nah, more likely they're just trying to save money on labour costs. I'm guessing they'd love to remove the scams.
36.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
It seems very much more likely that YT has ineffective moderation than that it doesn't want to take down scam ads.
37.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
No, this is James. I was letting people know in case they wanted to read a story about life on a moonbase.
38.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
It's not about the Moon
39.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Topic at hand is internet pornography
40.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
not coincidence, one is "in good we trust", the other one is "in code we trust"
41.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
just ban it
42.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Not everybody has a body of beliefs that guides him.
43.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
You'd be right if it was actually a definition. But it's not. It deals with the attributes of the thing rather than the thing's essence. Like, the "definition" of car is 'a vehicle moving on wheels', but w
44.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Epic logic fail. You're affirming the consequent. Just because A -> B, and we have B, doesn't mean we can conclude A. Sure, Idealogy -> a manner of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture But
45.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Seems like a pretty crazy claim, want to share your reasoning?
46.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Everyone? Plenty of people don't practice ideological thinking in the first place.
47.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
We are really the ones who provide that high quality. Wikipedia isn't edited by the Wikimedia foundation.
48.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Why are you asking about a scientific reason?
49.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Apparently, they can't do their lunar spacesuits until they do their lander > What's more, delays to Starship have knock-on effects because the spacesuit contractor needs to know how the suits will interface with the spacecraft
50.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
The main component missing for an American crewed lunar landing is a lunar lander, which is planned to be a version of the Starship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_HLS
51.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Why not? The Chinese Moon exploration programme is called "Chang'e" after their Moon goddess (who flew to the Moon). And Mao said that "Women hold up half the sky". And Xi Jinping has been pushing for female indepen
52.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Also, they're "missiles" in the same sense that your fireworks are missiles. Death count is zero.
53.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Also worth the reminder that Elon is not just the CEO
54.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
If they get it working the USA might beat China to putting a woman on the Moon.
55.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
my philosophy: its ok to have fun on the internet
56.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Space Race Two. China versus the USA. Which country will achieve the first crewed lunar landing of this millennium? Which country will set up the first permanent moonbase? Which country will achieve the first crewed martian landing? Which c
57.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
Will Grok really do any of those things? I would have guessed that RLHF would sort those things out even if it wasn't concerned with debiasing, but just about not making ridiculous mistakes.
58.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
It's very, very high for the UK, but pretty normal for the USA.
59.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
hmmm isn't it just exactly capitalism? and government intervening would maybe be against capitalism?
60.
▲
by
calderknight
3y ago
I would read his comment more as "I didn't know the company was still so big" than "wow how stupid are they that they didn't fire all those people years ago"
More ›