Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
caconym_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
301.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Perhaps you can show me where you think I said SpaceX shouldn't be subject to regulatory oversight.
302.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Given the incredibly hostile regulatory environment they've faced in Texas trying to operate their own private launch site, I think there are very clear benefits in using an established public facility that isn't under threat by c
303.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
I don't think the comment you replied to implies such a black and white distinction. Is it so absurd to suggest that some of the people working on Starliner actually cared, and did the best work they could? Managers too, though ultimat
304.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Given how much future is left (a whole lot), I don't really understand why some people seem so confident that humanity is just going to stay on Earth forever. Are you assuming industrial civilization will collapse? It's certainly
305.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
What do you imagine is the material difference between what I said and what you said? But if you want to split hairs like this, get it right: compan ies . Boeing is the primary contractor, but others likely share some responsibility---for i
306.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
It says a lot about the insane dangers of the Space Shuttle in particular. There were several issues with its design that made it an accident waiting to happen, notably its spotty abort coverage on ascent (even worse pre-Challenger) and the
307.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
It will certainly be (rightly) blamed on the vehicle. It's designed to operate completely autonomously---they flew two full test flights that way before ever putting crew on it.
308.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
You asked them to define successful, and they did (implicitly). The fact that you also provided your own arbitrary definition of successful seems largely irrelevant given that you asked them for their own, regardless of whether VS meets yo
309.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
My understanding is that commercialization certainly weakens a fair use argument, but that its absence does not automatically make a reproduction and/or distribution fair use.
310.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
I am seriously worried about what it's going to cost to buy my daughter a seat at the human table rather than defaulting to the AI slop trough it seems most kids less privileged than her will be forced to learn from in the near future.
311.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Right now automation allows neither of those things. The best you're going to get is existing games reskinned with AI slop assets---the new shovelware. In some hypothetical future world where GenAI content really is as novel and worthw
312.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
I certainly don't need Apple. My primary home router is a virtual machine running on a Proxmox cluster, and my house is serviced by three sub-$30 Netgear wifi 5 access points running OpenWRT with 802.11r fast transition on a wired ba
313.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
> Oh I thought they were talking about silly web comics and random art on the internet that was 'stolen'. It is extremely common for "silly web comics and random art on the internet" to be meaningfully monetized by th
314.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
> Properly compensated'... determined by the market, right? That's being driven close to $0, just like with software (and was headed that direction before the recent AI craze). This is just completely false, and there are so ma
315.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
> Imagine how many more video games and movies can be made when we don't need anywhere near as many artists as before. How many more diagrams in textbooks. How many extra illustrations for Wikipedia. With the possible exception of W
316.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Consumers deserve far better than what they're getting from network gear manufacturers—crap, and grossly overpriced crap. I wish Apple would get back into the game and at least offer some grossly overpriced non-crap.
317.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
The crews of Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia might take issue with your implication that glorious American capitalism could never produce similar outcomes.
318.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
You are simply underlining my point that your perspective is disproportionately (and inappropriately, in this context) focused on the Starship program, which is completely irrelevant to NASA's Commercial Crew program. It's true th
319.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
I think you're conflating the way SpaceX is developing Starship with the way the rest of their business operates (and has operated). Their Falcon rockets (i.e. the ones they actually sell launches on) have an outstanding reliability
320.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
> I wish you had read to the second paragraph of my comment, you'd see we agree. I wish you'd read my first comment before responding to a grossly distorted version of it that was clearly a result of projection on your part. I
321.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
It's pretty hard to beat an LLM for filling in common boilerplate or autocompleting relatively obvious lines of code that can be checked in a second or two, no matter how much experience you have.
322.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
In a space so rife with misinformation playing to both sides, I'm not interested in listening to claims like this made with zero evidence. Sorry.
323.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
> If you think Israel has more supporters on social media than Hamas, you definitely don't use twitter and probably don't use facebook. And you definitely don't use Tiktok, which is overwhelmingly anti-Israel. Can you show
324.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Exactly what I was going to say. Like, I have no idea, but this is an incredibly asymmetrical conflict and neither possibility (Hamas' social media misinformation campaign is comparable to Israel's, or it isn't) would surpris
325.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Your "solution" is so unrealistic for all but the very wealthiest people that it's on the verge of seeming disingenuous. My bank account would have to be quite a few orders of magnitude larger for me to be able to purchase ev
326.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
AFAICT people are not so much upset about objects of value being destroyed as they are about the symbolism of creative tools being crushed flat and turned into an iPad. For artists and similar creatives, it evokes the way AI companies have
327.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Yeah, that's fair. I definitely joke about it with folks whom I know have a sense of humor about such things...
328.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Individuals who have been (literally or figuratively) issued business cards that say "software engineer" on them have generally had no say in how the industry uses that language, and (frankly) if somebody harangued me about it as
329.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
A few weeks ago, I was unable to log in to Google on a new device with my 2FA token (Yubikey) because Google insisted on authenticating with a passkey/resident key, but the token had only been set up with non-resident TOTP or whatever
330.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Bitwarden, which you can self-host (I do this) seems to have at least partial support now, and I know they're working on improving it. However, I'm not sure if their client and server are both fully FOSS.
More ›