byyyy

12 ms·

61.
by byyyy 3y ago
To me it doesn't make sense. Why doesn't this exact same logic apply to individual success?
62.
by byyyy 3y ago
He cut to the chase. Which is what he said. The logical implications of genetics determining IQ is obvious. If genetics can determine physical appearance and genetics groups many certain physical aspects into a collection of common features
63.
by byyyy 3y ago
This is the paradox of IQ. IQ is only a slight predictor of individual of individual success there are many other factors that are superior to IQ for predicting individual success. However the paradox is that while IQ is not a good predicto
64.
by byyyy 3y ago
Of course. This is obvious. Anyone who disagrees is wrong. Just look at animal IQ. Clearly human intelligence is determined genetically. However, although human intelligence is clearly genetic and superior to most other animal intelligences
65.
by byyyy 3y ago
I recall reading an article about two high IQ and talented parents... both professors in very hard academic fields talking about their child and how they were trying to push their child into roles with high IQ. The parents were from China t
66.
by byyyy 3y ago
And I'm saying this strategy does absolutely nothing to alleviate the need for an actual raise.
67.
by byyyy 3y ago
You realize that the stock could've been bought with or without the raise? Buying stock does not magically eliminate the need for a raise.
68.
by byyyy 3y ago
You're mistaken and you're intuition is off. It lines up absolutely. Debris is almost any configuration of atoms that are considered trash or unusable. There's are much more ways you can configure atoms to form useless trash
69.
by byyyy 3y ago
>As a passing thought I've noticed that there's also sort of like a fierce loyalty to defending LLM's in the forums, often by people who display a certain amount of ignorance as to how they work. I wonder if there's a
70.
by byyyy 3y ago
Motion blur is an accurate rendition of how humans see things. Your eyes are not fast enough to take instantaneous pictures of fast moving objects. Instead when an object moves fast on an interval too fast for us to perceive we see everythi
71.
by byyyy 3y ago
>I haven’t seen it solve anything what I would consider even remotely complex. Its solving things that was unthinkably impossible to solve by AI. Think of it logically. Before it could do 0% of our ability. With chatGPT it increases to 3
72.
by byyyy 3y ago
They have a very high passing rate when the user is not actively investigating if the entity they are chatting with is an LLM. Thus the goal post has moved to incorporate this aspect. The goal post will keep moving as LLMs improve.
73.
by byyyy 3y ago
No those were never official goal posts. The one goal post was official and famous was the Turing test that measured if a human could tell the difference between a text chat generated by an AI or one generated by a human. https:/&#x2F
74.
by byyyy 3y ago
Do you see the irony? You wrote code that could have eliminated other people's jobs. Someone else "wrote" chatGPT and it very much looks like the precursor to the thing that could eliminate your job. I can almost imagine the
75.
by byyyy 3y ago
>Unfortunately, a lot of people make entire careers of that kind of work. "Paper pusher" type jobs are the most at risk but so are the low end of lots of creative jobs like copywriting, graphic design and even script writing. D
76.
by byyyy 3y ago
In my opinion. No. Watch comparison videos as well, you can barely tell the difference.
77.
by byyyy 3y ago
Tbh when compared with raytracing I couldn't tell if it was better when playing. Note that I could tell it was very different but I couldn't tell if it was "better". When watching direct comparison videos path tracing wa
78.
by byyyy 3y ago
Makes sense. In movies I see things like a dirty arrow or a sword is guaranteed death from infection. Assuming the movie portrayal is accurate what is the differentiating thing that causes a dirty wound from a weapon to kill but not a dirty
79.
by byyyy 3y ago
The technical term for this is macrostate. It is not a linguistic sleight of hand. It is literally within the formal definition entropy. Debris is a high entropy macrostate, while a car occupies a lower entropy macrostate. There are less po
80.
by byyyy 3y ago
No. Causation is different from correlation. "Associated with" means correlation, "probable cause" means causation. Causation is the stronger statement here. While technically association is a prerequisite for causation
81.
by byyyy 3y ago
Antibiotics?
82.
by byyyy 3y ago
It's a breakthrough but this research doesn't establish the claim in the title of the article. The next step is to establish causality. They will have to deliberately remove (and maintain removal of) this bacteria from certain peo
83.
by byyyy 3y ago
In that case complexity is created thereby proving my point anyway. Typically I define complexity as a low probability macrostate meaning low entropy. So debris generated from the explosion has a high probability of randomly occuring, while
84.
by byyyy 3y ago
>Fun part is there is no “better” in generic terms. No. It goes further then this. We actually don't even know if one is better or not. There is no formal theory that allows us to prove these designs. For example we have formal theo
85.
by byyyy 3y ago
>Complexity can neither be created nor destroyed, only moved somewhere else. Not true. I blow.up a car. Complexity is destroyed. I rebuild the car from blown up parts. Complexity is created. There's no underlying generic philosophic
86.
by byyyy 3y ago
Because we can't definitively prove which one is better. There is no formal theory around system design so you get people complaining about how monoliths are error prone and way too complex and you get people complaining about microser
87.
by byyyy 3y ago
Certainly given the information available one can make a fuzzy speculation on the cause. The cause likely has to do with Google and the location given that this is the second suicide from the same company and location.
88.
by byyyy 3y ago
There is actually a hierarchy of reincarnation with enlightenment being at the top. You can think of it like a mouse is lower form of life and if he works on his karma he can reincarnate as a racoon and then then if the racoon works on hims