byteofmydream

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by byteofmydream 5y ago

   And sometimes it's enough to simulate on the level of api's to get same results
2. 2.▲
   by byteofmydream 6y ago

   Sorry but I can't provide more objective reasons why not use Cypress except that cypress is more about aggressive marketing and promotion, but not a useful tool for testing. I don't want to write node.js inside separate files, I w
3. 3.▲
   by byteofmydream 6y ago

   jQuery promises are good as well, but I'm writing from 2020 :)
4. 4.▲
   by byteofmydream 6y ago

   this 2 'killer features' could be implemented in your tests in a day or two. Also, you can use video recording features implemented in docker images like Zalenium
5. 5.▲
   by byteofmydream 6y ago

   Cypress is very bad. What frustrated me most of all is that you can't use node.js, only 'browser javascript'. Also, absence of promises makes Cypress way behind its alternatives. Don't be fool, use TypeScript + Cucumber
6. 6.▲
   by byteofmydream 8y ago

   BTW, there are some pay-to-chat applications. i.e. WowApp ( https://www.wowapp.com/w/byteofmydream ) and also you can spend earned money to charity. Sorry for spam, I just think it's a bit related to the topic