byby

10 ms·

31.
by byby 3y ago
>I think if you're an expert in an area, Experts in the area, including Hinton, the father of modern AI, self admit they don't fully understand what's going on but they think that LLMs know what they are talking about. &gt
32.
by byby 3y ago
>The game was never writing the stack overflow answer -- that was already written. The problem is this was never a stackoverflow question and there was never an answer for it. Try finding it. The LLM is already playing the game because i
33.
by byby 3y ago
I'm just saying the tech is already here. The core engine can do it. Before you go on and write such a system it's better to test if the LLM can do debugging to an efficacy level that we require. I don't think anyone has trie
34.
by byby 3y ago
>Create a web site using language X with framework Y Not sure if you played with chatGPT, but you can ALREADY ask it to do this and it will give you something that works 50% of the time.
35.
by byby 3y ago
I don't think you get it. The game has already changed. And nobody trained the AI to write unit tests or refactor code. It could do it as emergent behavior. It happened so fast that so many people are in denial and many people aren&#x2
36.
by byby 3y ago
>Everyone's trying to train GPT models to write code, but maybe we should be training them how to use a debugger. Though its a lot harder to map text generation to debugging... We can actually try this now. Literally tell the LLM wh
37.
by byby 3y ago
>If you read a histories any war/conflict where there are large numbers of horses involved, a common theme is them just dropping dead of exhaustion along the side of the trail, because they can't sustain the pace of the army ma
38.
by byby 3y ago
Learned something new. I feel though it's better if most programmers didn't know about this. It looks like cursed knowledge.
39.
by byby 3y ago
I'm aware of this. We can run down a cheetah or bunny. But we can't actually run down a horse. Only top ultra marathoners can do that. But walking down a horse? Really?
40.
by byby 3y ago
This is a good start up idea in biotech. And highly lucrative. Genetically engineered tea cup elephants.
41.
by byby 3y ago
I've heard of the fact we have more endurance then the horse but walk one to death? Source? Or deeper explanation?
42.
by byby 3y ago
Yeah but this was definitely achieve well before 200 years. Armies existed since the dawn of civilization. We are talking B.C. dates.
43.
by byby 3y ago
>I like exceptions. You can't get away from them, I know Haskell tried, Rust tried, they still have exceptions (perhaps they call them by a different name though) Rust has no exceptions in any sense of the word. Exceptions are ways
44.
by byby 3y ago
Not really. Aiming and shooting is far more precise in red dead. Combat controls are instantaneous. You fire your gun, the bullet comes out and goes in a straight line towards an enemy on every click. You can headshot an entire gang of peo
45.
by byby 3y ago
It makes sense for disk persistence to be io but redis is primarily in memory. So I don't think async applies to that aspect of it. In theory that makes it so all operations on the database from the user perspective are serial. Not sur
46.
by byby 3y ago
This is mainly because it's single threaded and operates on in memory state. Async io doesn't apply to in memory so all operations have to be serial, is this characterization correct? Thanks.
47.
by byby 3y ago
No this isn't the problem. There is huge demand for skilled teachers as in teachers that are extremely good at their job. Huge demand. There's also too little supply. It Could be a lucrative career if the system were setup better.
48.
by byby 3y ago
Side question about redis: Does redis do async operations? I'm not sure how that would work because it's known to be in memory. But I do know it persists to disk. So basically my question is: Does almost absolutely every operation
49.
by byby 3y ago
> I was equally immersed 20 years ago playing Gothic and Oblivion as I am playing recent games, graphically speaking. But you wouldn't be immersed on Gothic now. By playing gothic you set a new bar for yourself and that's how t
50.
by byby 3y ago
I bet you didn't like elden ring or any of the dark souls games either. In general the clunky controls are a style of game and promotes a certain type of game play. It turns off people who want instantaneous responsiveness, but there&#
51.
by byby 3y ago
It is for most customers. They're not buying a movie, they're buying a movie player that only plays Disney movies. For me and you we can likely buy every console but most of this rivalry stems from the fact that most people buy on
52.
by byby 3y ago
Yeah probably not. If you prefer really snappy controls and fluidity then games like RDR2 or elden ring or souls like games are not for you. That being said, in general, these games are not games that are generally considered to have bad co
53.
by byby 3y ago
>I'd have to think about it, but I might defend the NES, SNES, and Gamecube as the best consoles of their generations NES yes, it's competitor was atari and atari had games that weren't that great. The NES launched games a
54.
by byby 3y ago
Hmm maybe it's a bad term. I was trying to convey the fact that gamers that enjoy something like fallout or Diablo or Mass effect or RDR2, those types of gamers lose out when they lock themselves onto nintendo. I for one like every gen
55.
by byby 3y ago
So did I, I bought all the consoles and the wii system is the most focused in terms of genre. Very casual and age friendly.
56.
by byby 3y ago
Metroid is one of the least casuals but that's as casual as nintendo will get. Simple stories no blood, no dark hard themes like in RDR2 or dead space. >What do God of War, RDR2, and Dead Space have in common that makes them not cas
57.
by byby 3y ago
We hit a clock limit ages ago and switched to parallelism. I still remember the days there things were in mhz and we were going 90, 100, 200, 300, 500, 1ghz, 2, 3 ... and we'd be at hundreds of ghzs if we didn't hit a limit. Now w
58.
by byby 3y ago
>"Emergent abilities" in that paper is an extraordinarily poor communication of the idea that larger models can do more than smaller models, which should be a surprise to no one. Nothing on the face of the earth can be a sum of
59.
by byby 3y ago
Except this doesn't make any sense. Moores law is beginning to fail size has a physical limit in that we can't get much smaller than an atom. The potential of AI on the other hand is clear. Look at your self. If someone as intelli
60.
by byby 3y ago
I played on PC. Mouse and keyboard. The controls were excellent.

More ›