>I think if you're an expert in an area, Experts in the area, including Hinton, the father of modern AI, self admit they don't fully understand what's going on

>I think if you're an expert in an area, Experts in the area, including Hinton, the father of modern AI, self admit they don't fully understand what's going on but they think that LLMs know what they are talking about. >These systems are not "fully correct" and not "out of thin area". They are trained on everything ever digitised, including the entire internet. They, in effect, find similar historical cases to your query and merge them. In many cases, for specific enough queries, the text is verbatim from an original source. I never said the systems are fully correct. I said that for my specific example the answer is fully correct and out of thin air. No such question and answer pair exists on the internet. Find it and prove me wrong. >This will be clear to everyone pretty quickly, as with all tech, it's "magic" on the first encounter -- until the limitations are exposed. Except many experts are saying the exact opposite of what you're saying. I'm just parroting the experts.. >I actually work in an area where what took 3mo last year, I can now do in maybe 3 days due to ChatGPT. But when it comes to providing my customers with that content, the value was always in how I provided it and what it did for them. So if they knew you were just copying and pasting their queries to chatgpt would they still care about the "how"? I doubt it.