Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bvda
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
Insanely useful?
2.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
> Personally, I have always found it important to actually understand the things I am using. This article is aimed at readers who do find understanding the constructions they use important.
3.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
7. any explanation why it would be caused by complexity of everyday life?
4.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
I am glad I am not the only one against this. Especially iOS developers seem to love to put Emoji in their tooling and git repos, but that's just my experience.
5.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
Except if that add on blocks Google's precious ads
6.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
Is there a non-paywalled version?
7.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
> People are not blindly throwing money at every .com IPO that comes out. Now it's ICOs...
8.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
This, and the earlier you start the better.
9.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
I wonder why they chose to use (yet another) crypto currency for this.
10.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
Not surprisingly so if you've worked with Android's Camera(2) APIs
11.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
The future is now
12.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
I've used a similar trick to pretend I was 18+ on certain websites in the past, have never had any issues with it.
13.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
What are the ratings based on? What are the criteria to receive a ++ rating?
14.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
Ah interesting, I hadn't thought of those use cases.
15.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
Is there any reason not to use a singular field for this? It seems so much simpler to just give the user one input field and it would cover all scenarios.
16.
▲
by
bvda
7y ago
>A VPN for People Who Don’t Know What V.P.N. Stands For I don't think their target audience includes those people (privacy minded folks.)
17.
▲
by
bvda
9y ago
And now you aren't able to use Skype for anything anymore :p
18.
▲
by
bvda
9y ago
Assuming he is going to have children
19.
▲
by
bvda
9y ago
Do you happen to know why that was perceived as worse? If I understand correctly the difference would be that you'd have to write (i * sizeof(char)) vs. (sizeof(char[i]))? Personally I'd even prefer the former.